Attend or Don't Attend? 2nd Marriage, No Annulment

  • Thread starter Thread starter weiss531
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
W

weiss531

Guest
I have an Aunt who is being married for the second time and did not receive an Anulment from her first marriage. Relatives from all over are coming in for the wedding. Any thoughts? I guess the question is, should I stay or should I go now (not to be confused with the song) 🤓
 
No, as she will be formalizing an adulterous relationship. Those who attend a marriage ceremony act as “witnesses” to it. You will be lending your approval by attending, celebrating, and witnessing to this sinful event.
I have declined to attend the marriages of an aunt, an uncle, and my own father for this same reason. It is hard, and embarresing, but it is the right thing to do. In the end, you will be glad that you stood up for Jesus and His truths.

God Bless.
 
I say go, but don’t make a big production about your presence. Jesus welcomed sinners and ate with them. Someone has to extend a palm branch to your aunt; it might as well be you.

After swallowing some serious heartburn, I did attend my sister’s second wedding in another state - alone. I did NOT bring my teenage children, and kept my own participation to a minimum.

Her first wedding: Catholic, neither one ready for marriage, definitely the wrong guy, messy divorce in 18 months. No annulment, even after 16 years. Fortunately, no kids either.

Her second wedding: Jewish, absolutely the nicest guy, has all the makings of a long-term marriage. Where was this one the first time around?

My hope: that her happiness with this husband will inspire her to get the annulment that she has been avoiding for the last 16 years.

Side benefit of attending: sharing a hotel room and a long weekend with my parents, which was a rare occurence. It’s even more precious to me now, because it was the last time I spent with my father before he died.
 
Why would you want to witness an adulterous relationship? I vote that you not go. Too many of these type marriages occur today with even members of the church occasionally looking the other way. This is a serious sin against the Sixth Commandment which came directly from God. Then Jesus Himself said that He hates divorce. What more does it take to tell people what is right and wrong?
Just because the crowds are going doesn’t mean you have to do the wrong thing. Be strong and please God.
 
40.png
Romick:
Why would you want to witness an adulterous relationship? I vote that you not go. Too many of these type marriages occur today with even members of the church occasionally looking the other way. This is a serious sin against the Sixth Commandment which came directly from God. Then Jesus Himself said that He hates divorce. What more does it take to tell people what is right and wrong?
Just because the crowds are going doesn’t mean you have to do the wrong thing. Be strong and please God.
Whoa! Judge not lest thee be judged. We witness alot of sin in this world. In this case to react harshly, we are making a judgment of their situation that is not ours to make. If everyone knew of all the sin I’ve done, I fear that many would push me out of the Church too. The Church is for sinners on the road to Heaven and we are called to help them along the way. Don’t run them over!

I think you should ask these questions:
  1. Does she understand that she will not be able to recieve the Eucharist and other Sacraments as long as they are living together in a congugal way? If she doesn’t, you should make sure that she is made aware of this either by yourself, a Priest or someone else she respects.
  2. Will she continue to try to recieve Communion and thus be creating a scandal at least among your family if not the entire parish and faith community? If she won’t recieve the Sacraments she is making a decision that effectively means she is choosing to “fast” from the sacraments. This is a serious decision and one that requires the faithful to pray for her and to support her emotionally and spiritually during her period of fasting.
I know this situation firsthand. My wife of 19 years was married before in the Church. She left him and took her children to another town because of alcoholism and being a generally unfit husband/father. Her leaving him is totally consistent with the Church’s teaching on marriage. This was never a sacramental marriage.

We met, began dating and fell in love. Because she had children that I grew to love and wanted to raise as my own, we decided to get married civilly even though she was not yet prepared to get her annulment so I could with more authority assume the role of fatherly influence on these wonderful kids.

We knew the consequences of this decision in the Church’s eyes. We met with our Pastor many times before we did it. We knew we were embarking on a period of sacramental fasting that would be of an indeterminate period (She promised she’d go thru the annulment process but didn’t promise when it would be and we knew there was no assurance it would ever be granted).

But we were confident that we were people of a well formed conscience and knew that our love was sincere. We reached a studied, informed conclusion that her first marriage was never a sacramental marriage based on the Church’s teaching (I don’t want to go thru with the details but ultimately the tribunal agreed) and thus we were effectively choosing to cohabitate and did not have the Church’s blessing (church as in institution and faith community). We continued to attend Mass, prayed for a Spiritual Communion (as all Catholics can when they are in a state of sin and unable to recieve the Eucharist), and recieved a blessing from the Priest. We worked hard to make sure that nothing we said or did would create a scandal against the Church among the parish or our own home.

Finally, after five years and two more kids, my wife found the “courage” to begin the process again (she had quit it before we met and and again shortly after our civil ceremony as the pain was too intense/fresh) where she ultimately received her annulment and our marriage was blessed in a very joyous ceremony of many friends and relatives.

After we recieved the marriage blessing, we heard from many (our Priest included) that our act of faith of attending Mass every week, volunteering on committees that were non-theological like cleaning the church or caring for the grounds, and showing to all that we continued to have a faithful, prayerful life was an inspiration.

Now I teach RCIA and I handle the marriage part. I can talk with authority that the fact that our Communion is not open to people of all faiths is not punitive but based on principles that are applied also to Catholics. I can talk about how much more precious the Eucharist is after “fasting” for five years. My wife and I are also aMarriage Sponsor couple that meets with couples prior to their marriage. We usually get couples that are cohabitating or have been married before. We can talk to them on a level that others are unable to do and our Pastor believes we enhance the Church’s teaching by our personal experience.

My point is that those who expressed an answer to this complex question don’t know enough to make such an expression. Unless the answer to the questions I had at the beginning are not the right ones, go to the civil ceremony (if it is in another Church, this is a totally different issue). It is in abandoning our breathren that we fail to preach the Gospel.

I don’t advocate that the attendee express approval. But that doesn’t necessarily require that the attendee express disapproval. My family (extended and immediate) made their expression in their muted enthusiasm for and at the civil ceremony and their joyous expression at the sacramental ceremony.
 
So basically, Orionthehunter, you followed YOUR OWN rules by marrying a woman who was married to someone else without an annulment. Oh yes, I understand she eventually got the annulment AFTER you had 2 children with her, but I question your integrity and attitude of following church teaching…at the time you married her, she did NOT have the approval of the church. But that’s okay, because you just went YOUR WAY and had a civil marriage.

Oh sure, you were " were embarking on a period of sacramental fasting" but you didn’t stay away from sex, that’s a lot harder. So you just did what you wanted.

It isn’t your sin that bothers me, it’s the way you try to tell us how holy and righteous you were when you were in the middle of it.

Back to the question at hand…I believe our original poster should not attend the wedding.
 
If it were me, I would not go.

I see it as hypocrisy to say you believe in one thing and do things that contradict that. That is the sign of being a relativist.

PF
 
You are totally missing my point. I don’t condone what we did. And we have discussed it many times in our 19 years together how and if we made the right choice.

My point is that we observe sin all the time or behaviour that is contrary to church teaching. We can deal with it with recrimination and condemnation or we can show the gentle heart of Jesus.

If the Church, my family or my parish had thrown me out like you advocate, I fear where I’d be today. Nobody said what we did was right. My Pastor urged my wife to pursue the annulment and postpone the wedding. Unfortunately, she didn’t have the “courage” to do it at that time. This is a very emotional process (albiet cleansing and redeeming). We weighed a lot of issues and made the decision we did and we did none of it lightly.

We understood the consequences it would have in our communion with the Church and our ability to recieve the Sacraments. We did it with consultation of a very orthodox Priest whereby we discussed the nature of the sin (grievous/mortal/venial, etc.).

From the Catechism:

Mortal sin destroys charity in the heart of man by a grave violation of God’s law; it turns man away from God, who is his ultimate end and his beatitude, by preferring an inferior good to him.

Venial sin allows charity to subsist, even though it offends and wounds it.

Mortal sin is a radical possibility of human freedom, as is love itself. It results in the loss of charity and the privation of sanctifying grace, that is, of the state of grace. If it is not redeemed by repentance and God’s forgiveness, it causes exclusion from Christ’s kingdom and the eternal death of hell, for our freedom has the power to make choices for ever, with no turning back. However, although we can judge that an act is in itself a grave offense, we must entrust judgment of persons to the justice and mercy of God.

I wonder how you would react if one of your children chose to cohabitate or made a similar decision? Would you never go visit them? Would you not recognize their children?

Christ came to save the sinful not the righteous. I acknowledge that what we did was sinful. I sin every day and so do you. But neither of know the true nature of another’s sin and to the degree that it removes us from God.

To this day, I am totally convinced in my heart that I have done more things this week that are more grievous and injurious to my soul than that decision. I married a wonderful lady that I love and I believe was called by God to be married to her. I got to raise in the Church two wonderful step-children who have now given me grandchildren. I got to counsel and comfort her as she reconciled herself with the Church during the emotional annulment process.

Please keep in mind a couple of things. The Sacraments are gifts from God instituted by the Church to bring us closer to God. It is possibe (but more difficult) to be close to God without the sacraments as the Church teaches how people (whether unchurched or practicing another religion) may still recieve Redemption from Christ.

Depending on how the attendee’s relationship was with the person getting married, the attendee can express her views in many ways, including having a personal conversation expressing that the person is unable to attend. However, I can assure you that if it is done with the hardness of heart and tone of castigation that you have, it will not lead anyone closer to Jesus and communion with the Church.

As someone who has been the beneficiary of the gentleness of Jesus during a period as this, I believe that however it is handled it must be done Christ-like and not done with recrimination and condemnation as you recommend. While it is easy to say that you hate the sin but love the sinner, by just abandoning them as if they don’t exist (and I guarantee that by dissing their ceremony, they will not see any love from you regardless of your intentions)you are not loving the sinner. Instead you are the person that Jesus looked at when Mary Magdalan was at his feet and he said" May the one who has not sinned cast the first stone."
 
40.png
WanderAimlessly:
If it were me, I would not go.

I see it as hypocrisy to say you believe in one thing and do things that contradict that. That is the sign of being a relativist.

PF
Please read my previous comment. Fearing that you would be a hypocrite maybe motivated by selfishness or self righteousness. I hope I’m not sounding judgmental.

And I’m not advocating anything relativist.

I acknowledge that what we did was sinful and against the Church’s teaching. We both regret that we did things that way and wish we had done them differently. We face our decision everytime we meet with a marriage couple and discuss lifestyle things with our children (married and still at home).

But I want you to know that it was the loving hand of Christ that we recieved from our Pastor, our families, and friends (while never condoning what we did) that helped us during our time in the wilderness and brought us back into full Communion with the Church. I fear where we would be today if they had not responded as they did. I am eternally grateful that the Holy Spirit both guided them and comforted us during this period. I am also grateful that our parish, friends and family were more concerned about our well-being than they were with whether they might be percieved as a “hyporcrite” or “relativist.”

I hope that the person who started this thread also prayerfully reflects on how to best handle this.
 
I say, don’t attend. You should do your best to set a good example.

I’m not saying break off all relations with them/her. Instead, express your feelings about the necessity of an annulment, and then don’t attend the ceremony unless she obtains an annulment. If you do attend, they may feel that you don’t really believe in what you say, and then why should they pay heed??

My father had the same predicament when his sister married again. The guy she married (the second time) is a great guy, as well as being Catholic; but because she didn’t get an annulment they weren’t married in a Catholic church but instead in a Protestant one. My father, after deliberation, took his wife and large family of young kids and attended. To this day he regrets that he did so, and believes he should have stayed at home. Also, to this day, she has not “bothered” to obtain an annulment. 😦

Oh, and OriontheHunter: as for the whole “Jesus came to call the sinners” thingy; remember that WE are now the ones supposed to call the sinners with Christ acting through us, and the best way to do that is by example. What I mean is, don’t condone, show approvement of, or even attend adulterous marriages.

That’s my opinion 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top