L
Lazerlike42
Guest
This lovely site contains the following statement:
"The early church fathers only accepted the thirty-nine books of the Old Testament. The only exception was Augustine (A. D. 400) who included the books of the Apocrypha (those “extra” books that some Bibles include between the books of the Old and New Testaments). However, he did acknowledge that they were not fully authoritative. "
Now I don’t need most of the stuff addressed, I was just providing the source. I don’t really even need the canonicity of the deuterocanon addressed. I am only curious as to what this statement is supposed to be based on. I know we can throw it out because he provides no proof, but Norman Geisler must at least have some place that this idea supposedly comes from…
"The early church fathers only accepted the thirty-nine books of the Old Testament. The only exception was Augustine (A. D. 400) who included the books of the Apocrypha (those “extra” books that some Bibles include between the books of the Old and New Testaments). However, he did acknowledge that they were not fully authoritative. "
Now I don’t need most of the stuff addressed, I was just providing the source. I don’t really even need the canonicity of the deuterocanon addressed. I am only curious as to what this statement is supposed to be based on. I know we can throw it out because he provides no proof, but Norman Geisler must at least have some place that this idea supposedly comes from…