Australian bishops do what U.S. bishops did not

  • Thread starter Thread starter Catholic29
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Catholic29

Guest
Now here is an example of a body of bishops that didn’t pass over one of their little ones in need. My hat is off for them:tiphat:

Catholic leaders question decision

Liam Houlihan, religious affairs reporter
28jul05

CATHOLIC leaders have expressed concern at the Public Advocate’s decision to stop feeding Maria Korp.

Public Advocate Julian Gardner said an expert Catholic ethicist approved of the procedure as consistent with views held by Catholics.

But leading Catholic figures said the decision to stop feeding Mrs Korp by tube was dangerous moral territory.

The Public Advocate’s decision has been complicated by the fact Maria Korp is Catholic and was a regular churchgoer.

“The Catholic position is that the person retains a right to nutrition and hydration until the body rejects it, especially in cases of terminal illness,” Melbourne Archbishop Denis Hart said.

Archbishop Hart declined to comment on the specific case of Mrs Korp, saying there might be facts in her case he did not know about and he did not want to get involved in a polemic.

Auxiliary Bishop of Melbourne Christopher Prowse said the church never supported the removal of water and nourishment, even from comatose patients.

“The dignity of every human person demands basic hydration and nutrition,” he said.

"The Catholic Church is an advocate of life from womb to tomb.

"We have a very sophisticated system of palliative care in Australia and it needs to be made much more of a priority than it currently is.

“The perception in the community is this has been done a little imprudently.”

Bishop Prowse said Catholic doctrine allowed removal of life-support mechanisms, such as artificial respirators, in some situations.

Mr Gardner said his office had spent much time talking to those close to Mrs Korp to get as clear a picture as possible of her beliefs and value systems.
 
Catholic29:

Good Catch - I think you’re right. They deserve to be commended for doing what was right when there seemed to be a cost.

I have NO idea why someone would want to use a “Expert Catholic Ethicist” who would make a decision contrary to the recently repeated Teaching of the Church, unless he wanted to pull the tube and had been “forum shopping” (looking for an ethicist who would agree with him and say it was OK to pull the tube)…
40.png
Catholic29:
Now here is an example of a body of bishops that didn’t pass over one of their little ones in need. My hat is off for them:tiphat:

Catholic leaders question decision

Liam Houlihan, religious affairs reporter
28jul05

CATHOLIC leaders have expressed concern at the Public Advocate’s decision to stop feeding Maria Korp.

Public Advocate Julian Gardner said an expert Catholic ethicist approved of the procedure as consistent with views held by Catholics.

But leading Catholic figures said the decision to stop feeding Mrs Korp by tube was dangerous moral territory.

The Public Advocate’s decision has been complicated by the fact Maria Korp is Catholic and was a regular churchgoer.

“The Catholic position is that the person retains a right to nutrition and hydration until the body rejects it, especially in cases of terminal illness,” Melbourne Archbishop Denis Hart said.

Archbishop Hart declined to comment on the specific case of Mrs Korp, saying there might be facts in her case he did not know about and he did not want to get involved in a polemic.

Auxiliary Bishop of Melbourne Christopher Prowse said the church never supported the removal of water and nourishment, even from comatose patients.

“The dignity of every human person demands basic hydration and nutrition,” he said.

"The Catholic Church is an advocate of life from womb to tomb.

"We have a very sophisticated system of palliative care in Australia and it needs to be made much more of a priority than it currently is.

“The perception in the community is this has been done a little imprudently.”

Bishop Prowse said Catholic doctrine allowed removal of life-support mechanisms, such as artificial respirators, in some situations.

Mr Gardner said his office had spent much time talking to those close to Mrs Korp to get as clear a picture as possible of her beliefs and value systems.
… My suspicion is that Mr. Gardner may have done the same thing with the relatives, or he may even have resorted to telling them that a feeding tube was the same as a ventilator. That would have caused the necesary confusion…

One additional question is, Did Mr. Gardner get an inexperienced, confused ethicist and put the question to him or her in just that confusing manner in the hopes of getting the answer he wanted?

Either way, since anyone wanting to know can know the teaching of the Church on this without too much effort, this has a bit of a stench…

Time for me to do the Advance Directive and to make sure that I name people who know the Teaching of the Church and won’t be confused by the likes of Mr. Gardner!

I think the same may apply to the rest of the people in this forum whose countries and tates allow Advance Directives. We just can’t afford to have people like Mr. Gardner being allowed in the decision making process - If they are, the Grundegen University Hospital Protocols will apply…

Remember, they don’t have to be evil, just under a lot of pressure to save money on “terminal patients” so they can use that money to treat younger people who really need it. In those cases, it’s best to remove the temptation…

Blessed are they who act to save God’s Little Ones, Michael
 
Re Public Advocate Julian Gardner said an expert Catholic ethicist approved of the procedure as consistent with views held by Catholics.

It appears to me that one can find an expert Catholic ethicist to approve anything if one is willing to pay him to spend a day or so agonizing over the decision. :rolleyes:
 
Joe Kelley:
Re Public Advocate Julian Gardner said an expert Catholic ethicist approved of the procedure as consistent with views held by Catholics.

It appears to me that one can find an expert Catholic ethicist to approve anything if one is willing to pay him to spend a day or so agonizing over the decision. :rolleyes:
Generally none only has to travel to the closest Jesuit college to find one of these approving Catholic ethicist
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top