Babylon Bee satire? Nope

  • Thread starter Thread starter flamingpuppet
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I have my doubts that it will pass into law as well but it is still sickening that the LGBTQ agenda is willing to pursue goals such as this. They want to eliminate any distinction between male and female. It’s a part of their whole gender ideology thing.
 
Did anyone research this? I’m one who has always shopped the entire store. When my husband had a mechanical heart pump installed, I was thrilled to find a shirt in the women’s department that had a zipper to allow his cords to exit.

For Christmas, I shopped both sides for my friend’s little boy. Usually it is the other way around, as not everyone wants pink frilly unicorns for their little girl

https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article240601601.html
 
It’s frivolous legislation and the work of the devil, who hates God’s holy creation of man and woman and their rightly ordered relationship.
 
Last edited:
It will just make shopping all that much harder/time consuming if your kid is like 98% of other kids and wants to wear clothes that match their sex. How ridiculous!
 
Tell me, what is the difference with little kids clothes? They all wear little socks and little shirts and little pants or shorts.

Until the 1940’s in the West, pink was a color reserved for boys. It was stronger and more masculine than other colors.

Used to be that in the West, all children wore white dresses until around age 6.

Clothing changes over time.
 
The rationale for this kind of “clothing change” is gender erasure.
 
I don’t know about a law but the divisions of “boy” things vs “girl” things in stores is ridiculous. You can’t even buy gender neutral things for babies anymore (what if you don’t know ahead of time).
 
TheLittleLady said:
Tell me, what is the difference with little kids clothes?
Click to expand...
You’ve been in stores and can answer your own question.

Why must this be mandated by the government? If clothing styles are blending between boys and girls, why not let the retailer just manage their display?
 
TheLittleLady said:
Tell me, what is the difference with little kids clothes? They all wear little socks and little shirts and little pants or shorts.

Until the 1940’s in the West, pink was a color reserved for boys. It was stronger and more masculine than other colors.
Click to expand...
I was thinking more along the lines of pants, jeans and shorts. They aren’t cut the same nor are they sized the same. It just seems like an unnecessary hassle to paw through a bunch of stuff you don’t want, if things like that aren’t separated by sex.
 
Some of the cuts for girls leave a lot to be desired. I ended up buying old jeans and cutting the off at the knee because all the shorts I could find for a six year old girl were so short they showed her underwear when she sat down.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top