R
rca8497
Guest
I am often bothered by what I feel is a lack of balance in many parishes between going to church for personal/popular worship, and fellowship opportunities.
Clearly the paramount reason we attend Mass or come to church is to be in the presence of the Lord’s Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity. We also seek sacramentals, prayer services such as Vespers, etc. and other traditions. But as Catholics, it seems our parishes either succeed in being reverent places of worship, or vibrant social settings with lots of liturgical issues needing attention. Does this make sense?
Consider a parish that is quite orthodox and follows the Church’s teachings and the Roman Missal closely. There is little organized opportunity for fellowship, and the pastor exhorts those with ideas to form committees or start events. Rarely does one see the pastor committing himself to meeting with individual parishioners, nor trying to get many events going himself. It is up to the lay people and religious brothers/sisters to handle such things.
On the other hand, you have a large, often suburban parish with many families of all ages. There are many ministries available and crowded Masses, but one would see many liturgical aberrations there, but the feeling of community is strong. One also feels the pastor is quite involved directly with ministries, personal outreach, etc.
Is this all just a result of the spirit of each pastor and the mood cast in each parish?
It seems like we cannot on the whole find parishes that balance devotion and liturgy of high quality and great reverence, with the Christian calls to socialize, support one another, and be a parish family.
I will be working to help raise fellowship in my parish, but I feel the institutional Church needsto step up and push for a worldwide cause to encourage us to know and love one another, not just worship side by side and head home. To me, this example starts with pastors, and then through parishioners. Should it really all be up to lay people to get things going?
Clearly the paramount reason we attend Mass or come to church is to be in the presence of the Lord’s Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity. We also seek sacramentals, prayer services such as Vespers, etc. and other traditions. But as Catholics, it seems our parishes either succeed in being reverent places of worship, or vibrant social settings with lots of liturgical issues needing attention. Does this make sense?
Consider a parish that is quite orthodox and follows the Church’s teachings and the Roman Missal closely. There is little organized opportunity for fellowship, and the pastor exhorts those with ideas to form committees or start events. Rarely does one see the pastor committing himself to meeting with individual parishioners, nor trying to get many events going himself. It is up to the lay people and religious brothers/sisters to handle such things.
On the other hand, you have a large, often suburban parish with many families of all ages. There are many ministries available and crowded Masses, but one would see many liturgical aberrations there, but the feeling of community is strong. One also feels the pastor is quite involved directly with ministries, personal outreach, etc.
Is this all just a result of the spirit of each pastor and the mood cast in each parish?
It seems like we cannot on the whole find parishes that balance devotion and liturgy of high quality and great reverence, with the Christian calls to socialize, support one another, and be a parish family.
I will be working to help raise fellowship in my parish, but I feel the institutional Church needsto step up and push for a worldwide cause to encourage us to know and love one another, not just worship side by side and head home. To me, this example starts with pastors, and then through parishioners. Should it really all be up to lay people to get things going?