N
Neo_Canaan
Guest
Sheep. Ah-OOOOOH. I mean, baaaa baaaahuh?
If I recall I said
Just proving my point.
Sheep or goat. Pick one.
Sheep. Ah-OOOOOH. I mean, baaaa baaaahuh?
If I recall I said
Just proving my point.
Sheep or goat. Pick one.
So you ARE okay with religious discrimination aslong as you’re not the one being discriminated against?huh?
If I recall I said
Just proving my point.
Sheep or goat. Pick one.
pbs.org/kcet/publicschool/photo_gallery/photo2.htmlAs historian Father Richard Shaw says, “Irish Catholic children…were being expected to attend schools where the King James Bible was read, where Protestant hymns were being sung, where prayers were being recited, but most importantly where textbooks and the entire slant of the teaching was very much anti-Irish and very much anti-Catholic.”
Sec. 3**. Every popish priest who celebrates any marriage between a protestant and a papist or between 2 protestants shall be guilty of a felony, even though the marriage be null and void.
Sec. 12. No papist may serve on any jury in the trial of any suit between a protestant and a papist, and any challenge to such a juror being papist shall be allowed.
Sec. 1 The act of 8 Ann c.3 so far as it relates to the encouragement to popish priests becoming protestants, shall be revived and continued in force for 11 years.
law.umn.edu/irishlaw/chron-georges.html#anchor293506Sec. 3. Before voting, every person shall take the following oath:
I, A.B., do solemnly and truly affirm, that I am a freeholder… of the clear yearly value of 10 pounds, or of 40 shillings (as the case shall happen to be) … and that I am not a papist, or married to a papist, and that I do not educate or suffer to be educated, any of my children under the age of 14 years in the popish religion. So help me God.
They both STEEEEEEEENK!!So you ARE okay with religious discrimination aslong as you’re not the one being discriminated against?
How would you have responded as a Catholic to this situation:
pbs.org/kcet/publicschool/photo_gallery/photo2.html
Especially if there were truancy laws that forced you to send your kids there.
How woould you have responded had you lived in the UK between the 16th and 19th Centuries when laws like these existed:
law.umn.edu/irishlaw/chron-georges.html#anchor293506
But, hey Freedom of Religion is overrated and “those who aren’t for the lord are against him”. Question is: whose Lord? Hint: in the US only 23% of the Population is Catholic. Do you really want the “other” 77% perscribing religious observence for us?
You should be on your knees every night thanking God that you live in a country with the First Amendment and the ACLU to enforce it.
Yeah that about covers it.They both STEEEEEEEENK!!
No, I mean both the First Amendment and the ACLU steeeeeenk.Yeah that about covers it.
The reason we don’t have that here is the 1st Amendment and the vigilance of organizations like the ACLU.
And don’t kid yourself that “all that happneed in the past”. It is STILL against the law for member of England’s Royal Family to marry a Catholic.
“[B said:Neo[/B]
Canaan, post:45, topic:54551”]
No, I mean both the First Amendment and the ACLU steeeeeenk.
Neo Canaan:To clean up the world for Jesus’ sake. No one wants to burn in hell, 'y know.
…There is no such thing as the right not to be offended, and we shouldn’t tear down our history just because someone complains. The cross on Mt. Soledad had been placed there as an expression of gratitude and in the hopes that people in the future might be reminded that their freedom wasn’t free.As far as the famous cross on Mt Soledad, you do realize that the complaint was made by the Jewish War Veterns organization don’t you?
…It’s to COMMEMORATE the sacrifices of the people who made them in an appropriate fashion and to place the markers in a place where all Americans can see what they did and thank them for their sacrifices. I would much rather see a Menorrah or a Mogen David Adom alongside the Cross on Mount Soledad with a plague in Hebrew and English at bottom listing th names of the Jewish soldiers burried at the cemetery along with the Kaddish or Mourner’s Prayer than to see the Cross Removed.Aren’t Jews entitled to have their sacrifices commemorated by the US Government? What about Muslims? Native American? the Shintos and Budhists of the 442d RCT? To say nothing of the atheists and agnostics.
…Bill, that’s not the question here, because the Cross was a symbol, not only of PROSTANTISM, but of ALL OF CHRISTIANITY, Catholicsm, Orthodoxy, Protestantism and of all of the sects that split off before the Great Schism.How would you feel if the Goverment decided to commemorate the Sept 11 attacks by a religious display that promoted Mainstream Protestantism but was inimical to Catholicism. Wouldn’t you say “hey! Catholics died there too!”