Baptism and Confirmation: Efficacious? Original Sin?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JoyToBeCatholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi Joy,

With 2 little ones myself (1yo & 3 yo), I understand your time issue!
Awesome - my first 2 children were only 21 months apart - that does make it difficult! But they were a lot of fun to watch interact with one another. My youngest and I seem to be over this bug. 4 more to go (counting hubby - he always gets it the worst) 😦 We’ve got 2yo, 6,9 and 11 and one on the way 🙂

Thanks for the links. The name sounds familiar… EWTN maybe?
 
It was indeed a famous Pentecostal Minister who coined the phrase,“God has no grandchildren.” That is very true. When we take our infants and Baptize them, it is not the parents who pass on the sonship or daughterhood of God if you will, but Jesus the Christ who inhabits every Sacrament of the Church.

Original sin is washed away, but also very important, that child is gifted with the gifts of the Holy Spirit listed in Isaiah 11. Whether or not the child is capable of sin or of making a commitment to the Lord for himself, that child becomes an adopted son or daughter of God and receives Sanctifying Grace which lets him or her share in the very life of the Holy Trinity. He or she is anointed into the threefold role of Jesus their brother as priest, prophet, and king.

Similarly Confirmation is also an encounter with the living Christ in which the Holy Spirit strengthens those sevenfold gift and imparts others as well. Until the child reaches an age when he or she would be capable of rejecting God he or she develops and grows as a full member of the family of God. Much better in my estimation then to have to stumble along with only the parents for guidance until the age of reason or beyond arrives. The Orthodox Church recognizes the usefulness of this Sacrament when it Charismates babys at the time of Baptism.

The term “Original Sin” has its source in then theology of St. Augustine, but this human condition resulting from the wounding of the humanity of our first parents by sin is documented more than once in Genesis and the rest of the Scriptures.

It never fails to amaze me that many non-Catholics and even some Catholics put emphasis on what the human does in receiving the Sacraments of Baptism and Confirmation, when the real impact is what God does when he acts through these Sacraments.
Well, I think some non-Cs would definately agree that God does something apart from the Sacrament (it isn’t something WE do), but then the rite itself is a symbol of what God has already done. The question would be whether or not the rite itself is the avenue through which God imparts his gifts.
Born weighing only five pounds in the mid 30’s, I was baptized by a Jewish doctor on his own birthday. He was my physician until he died when I was in my early twenties. No one thought that I would survive. I always wonder whether in that Baptism I received not only spiritual life but the gift of a long life on earth as well. 🙂
Ah, thanks for sharing that. You are blessed, and may He continue to richly bless you!
 
Hmm… well, I’ve been baptized and have never really felt freed from my carnal state. But perhaps, with the acknowledgement and cooperation of the HS, it is possible to overcome that nature, whereas with the absence of the HS it would not be (?)

Thanks~
I think this is a good issue where it is best not to rely on one’s feelings, but in the Word of God. Granted, we will never be “really freed” until we get our heavenly body, but God declares that we are free by reason of baptism, and we are called to live in that freedom. Though we are no longer “compelled” (enslaved) by sin, we will struggle with the carnal part of ourselves throughout life. The best rendering of this is in Rom. 7, but look carefully at the last verse of chap. 7 then the first verse of ch 8. 👍
Yes, I’m not sure I see that as pointing to o.s. - it isn’t so clear…
Ok. what type of sin is the psalmist referring to, when he says “in sin did my mother conceive me”?
Again though, that is not so clear to me that it is pointing to o.s… But I see the possibility.
What was the source of the “utter sin” into which the blind man was born?
right I guess the problem I see with the correlation to circumcision is that the new covenant seems to focus on repentance and faith - real conversion - circumcision of the heart.
I would contend that this is what God wanted in the OT too, but could not obtain. I agree, but as long as we are slaves to sin, we are not able to focus on real conversion.

Rom 6:13-14
14 For sin will have no dominion over you, since you are not under law but under grace.
I suppose that is where confession comes in though (in the Catholic p.o.v.). It seems to me more biblical that repentance, faith and conversion would correlate with baptism - all of which are not possible for children.
I agree, the NT is a weak source for infant baptism. We can see some inklings, but for the most part, it is about adults. I don’t really think it became an issue until the first generation of Christians had children, which we don’t see in the NT.
It seems like a person-to-God event, not something that can be given to someone from someone else. Although, otoh, I do see that a child can be faithfully raised and never undergo that type of conversion at all, so I guess, in that sense, the parents did give something to the child. 🤷
Have you been to a baptism recently? It might be instructive to stand close by, and listen to the promises made by the parents and Godparents.
Really? First communion as an infant
Really! Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity. This is based on the Teaching that “unless you eat…you will have no life in you”. In the Eastern Rites, leavened bread is used, and it is intinctured (placed in the cup) then distributed by the priest or the deacon into the mouth with a spoon. The faithful do not handle the elements.
The diocese here does now require canditates to request confirmation, formally, in writing. I’m not sure if I had to do that back when I made mine, and I’m not sure it really solves the problem anyway: “Here Johnny. Write a letter to the bishop asking for Confirmation.”
It is a good exercise, but one has to wonder about sincerity. I have read these letters before they are sent, and they all seem authentic. But then, knowing the candidates, it seems that they are not.
That is very possible. Maybe it played a part in my own conversion. I do recall a longing to go back to mass after Confirmation but no one would accompany me and it just wasn’t “cool” for a teen to go alone :rolleyes: .
I think this is not uncommon at all!
 
Well, I think some non-Cs would definately agree that God does something apart from the Sacrament (it isn’t something WE do), but then the rite itself is a symbol of what God has already done. The question would be whether or not the rite itself is the avenue through which God imparts his gifts.Ah, thanks for sharing that. You are blessed, and may He continue to richly bless you!
No, it is not a symbol of what God has already done. It is a symbol of what God is doing as we follow the ritual of the sacrament. It is God who acts in the sacrament. Jesus is literally present and acting in the sacrament. A sacrament is truly an encounter with the living Christ, just as the two disciples encountered Jesus on the road to Emmaus. What we see and do is only a sign of what is really happening. Every Sacrament has its source in Jesus’s actions and teaching described in Scripture. When we do what Jesus has shown us, Jesus is present in a special way and through the Holy Spirit acts upon us.

As the old catechism said,“A sacrament is an outward sign instituted by Christ to give grace.” The essence of the Sacraments is the giving of sanctifying grace and the many other gifts God showers down upon us. One of the beautiful things is that while the effects of some sacraments last forever, others are cumulative and build up our store of sanctifying grace which may be described as the ability of a human being to participate in the divine life of the trinity, the family interactions of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. A weak analogy might be how lifting weights regularly builds up ones ability to lift even more weight as time goes on.

Baptism, Confirmation, and Holy Orders while they give sanctifying grace are ordered to giving other gifts which are permanent and mark or seal us forever. Penance, Holy Communion, Marriage, and Anointing of the Sick carry certain gifts or graces, but also have that cumulative effect on Sanctifying Grace and can be received more than once. 🙂 .
 
Awesome - my first 2 children were only 21 months apart - that does make it difficult! But they were a lot of fun to watch interact with one another. My youngest and I seem to be over this bug. 4 more to go (counting hubby - he always gets it the worst) 😦 We’ve got 2yo, 6,9 and 11 and one on the way 🙂

Thanks for the links. The name sounds familiar… EWTN maybe?
Hi Joy,

Yes, John Martignoni has been on EWTN. 👍 I fact, I believe he is on EWTN radio for an hour a week on Mondays (“Open Line” call in show, I believe). I’ll have to look at their site to verify it.

He does a very good job explaining why infant baptism is good & necessary thing, as it flows directly from the facts of original sin.

Chris
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top