D
Departed_Light
Guest
I think the school of thoughts about water baptism can be reduced to two basic camps.
If either is true and the other false does it matter what we think about it? Is the spiritual reality of baptism effected by what we think about it?
For the sake of argument and since this is a Catholic site: Let’s say the Catholic view is true and the other false. If a person is baptized in the Trinitarian formula in an ecclesial community that adheres to the idea of symbolic baptism and this person converts to Catholicism he is not baptized again, right? He just agrees to have a different understanding of the event.
Is the view of baptism one as the “non-essential” points of view that keep Christian communities divided?
- Baptism is efficacious and leaves an indelible mark on the soul and establishes the person in the Christian community.
- Baptism is an outward symbol of an inward work.
If either is true and the other false does it matter what we think about it? Is the spiritual reality of baptism effected by what we think about it?
For the sake of argument and since this is a Catholic site: Let’s say the Catholic view is true and the other false. If a person is baptized in the Trinitarian formula in an ecclesial community that adheres to the idea of symbolic baptism and this person converts to Catholicism he is not baptized again, right? He just agrees to have a different understanding of the event.
Is the view of baptism one as the “non-essential” points of view that keep Christian communities divided?