Beastiliaty Normalized In UK

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bantamchicken71
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
hmmm…I don’t see how anyone would want to do that…and I certainly don’t see how anyone who would want to would want to admit it. That’s just…disgusting. gag
 
m13 you wonder what’s going on in their minds. Perhaps they will fight for the right to marry their “partner”.
 
Just saw today where a woman in the upstate looked out the window and saw a teenage neighbor doing it to her dog. He was arrested and had his probation revoked for two previous convictions of sex with young girls. Sounds like somebody ought to take that guy to the vet and get him fixed.
 
40.png
geezerbob:
Just saw today where a woman in the upstate looked out the window and saw a teenage neighbor doing it to her dog. He was arrested and had his probation revoked for two previous convictions of sex with young girls. Sounds like somebody ought to take that guy to the vet and get him fixed.
Click to expand...
set him on leash

http://www.lyonshel.com/images/ Lion%20on%20a%20leash.jpg
 
That is absolutley disgusting. I’m too appaled for words. The fact that something like that can be accepted proves how messed up this world is.
 
**If you and I do not take action to clear out the present judicial and legislative people who do not uphold Christian values, we will see much worse. After all, look just at sociatal morality just 10 years, 20 years, and 30 years ago. No one whould have ever guessed it would go this far. And, its on its way deeper! **

So, make sure you write your representatives about issues, contribute to Priests for Life and other organizations and witrhdraw your consent from the likes of planned parenthood. Elect and support representatives with Christian core values and help rid us of the polution from the liberal ones who want to eliminate God and have an “everything goes” society. Don’t just talk about it-- take action!!! before its too late!!! Be the light for Jesus in todays darkness…speak out!!!

http://www.smilieland.com/graphics/bnr-ani-016-1.gif
 
Doesn’t Princeton “ethicist” Peter Singer endorse this?
 
If it is said to be sinful by the Church, Singer will endorse it.
 
the supreme punishment in empiral China(if you don’t know what it is, can think of hanging drawing and quartering) was reserved for high treason, petty treason and women bestiality.
 
THat it happens is extremely regrettable. That it is condoned is inexcusable.

Bestiality has got to be the lowest of human passions.
 
Yikes…I heard that blind dating can get ya stuck with a “dog” now and then…but this just takes the cake! 😃
 
Bantamchicken71 said:
media.guardian.co.uk/site/story/0%2C14173%2C1491990%2C00.html
Mr Hooper’s comments recalled Channel 4 bestiality documentary, Animal Passions, which featured a man who admitted have sex with his pony and a woman who had sex with her dog.
Click to expand...

From the article:​

Mr Hooper’s comments recalled Channel 4 bestiality documentary, Animal Passions, which featured a man who admitted have sex with his pony and a woman who had sex with her dog.

Although it was cleared by Ofcom last year, it generated 75 complaints from viewers who said it “normalised bestiality” and could encourage copycat behaviour.

The broadcasting code is intended to give broadcasters more “creative freedom” and allow audiences more responsibility in deciding what they watch.
“Freedom of expression does not necessarily mean swearing and offensive language,” said Mr Hooper.​

Unpleasant as this is, an account of bestiality, or a programme about someone who engages in it, is not, as such, a recommendation of it - any more than an interview with a member of a terrorist organisation which is recognised as such, is a recommendation of murder, theft, or bombing. Or any more than an interview with Donald Rumsfeld is a recommendation of his activities, whether real or alleged.

Interviewing someone who goes in for bestiality presumably shows that they are not regarded as being utterly “beyond the pale” - but is not in itself approval of bestiality. Interviewing them is quite compatible with strong revulsion for them, or their actions, or both. Is every interviewer of a neoconservative politician also a neoconservative, or friendly to that type of politics ?

Do all those in the US approve of the filth that Hollywood sometimes produces ? ##
 
Michael . . .choosing who to interview and how is a value judgement. The station is not drawing lots. That bestiality warrants attention in their minds (or lack of minds) says a lot about them. There are thousands of interesting topics from which to select. Only a certain warped mindset would select bestiality. Degrading culture by running such garbage is classic Gramscian socialism. Tear down all that which is good, decent, healthy and honest by promoting sickness and deviancy . Open a dialogue. This year these social termites may not get bestialtiy accepted as normal but, if they gnaw away for a few decades, they may.

Far as “neoconservatives”, I do not believe you know who is one and is not. Rumsfeld, Rice, Cheney, Bush are not. There is no “neocon” in a top position in this administration. Michael Moore, Bill Moyers, Ward Churchill, the World Socialist Web Site, Counterpunch and others on the far left believe everyone to the right of Joe Lieberman is a neocon That is absurd. Also a debasement of language (nothing new for the left).

New York Times writer Paul Krugman, about as left as one can get in the MSM, almost cried after the last election at a book fair in Miami. The neocons, he wailed, had lost what little power they had in the GOP. Econocons and Theocons had pushed them aside (as they always do). And he was correct. Wolfowitz wanted State or Defense. He got the World Bank…hahahaha.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top