J
If you think that the Bishops of the U.S. listen to Rome your deaf too.no, it’s not. it is a bunch of priests violating the current GIRM. why don’t they just put on some skirts and dance around while they’re at it? what’s the difference? isn’t there something wrong with saying ‘wow, that’s the kind of abuse i like to see.’ not following instructions is not following instructions. when it comes to the celebration of the Mass, either do what you are told or do nothing.
i just don’t get it. why do people on these forums compete, one heterodoxy against another. does nobody listen to the vatican?
cite one abuse… what, the center of the altar rail was not closed? …or you can’t smell the incense? …or too many concelebrates? …no, it’s not. it is a bunch of priests violating the current GIRM. why don’t they just put on some skirts and dance around while they’re at it? what’s the difference? isn’t there something wrong with saying ‘wow, that’s the kind of abuse i like to see.’ not following instructions is not following instructions. when it comes to the celebration of the Mass, either do what you are told or do nothing.
i just don’t get it. why do people on these forums compete, one heterodoxy against another. does nobody listen to the vatican?
Actually, there is nothing in these pictures that is against the current GIRM. In fact, since it is being celebrated Ad Orietem (facing away from the people) it is actually more in accord with the GIRM that Ad Populum, which is the exception)no, it’s not. it is a bunch of priests violating the current GIRM. why don’t they just put on some skirts and dance around while they’re at it? what’s the difference? isn’t there something wrong with saying ‘wow, that’s the kind of abuse i like to see.’ not following instructions is not following instructions. when it comes to the celebration of the Mass, either do what you are told or do nothing.
i just don’t get it. why do people on these forums compete, one heterodoxy against another. does nobody listen to the vatican?
Ah, so the Bishop in Alabama was…lying?..misinformed?..just wanted to pull a power trip?..what?Send the priests, altar boys, deacons and the Church to Los Angeles, its way better then what we now have.
The Mass can be celebrated either way, facing or away.
james
I’m a little confused here. Is it a “Novus Ordo” Mass. What exactly is wrong with it? I think there might be a misunderstanding about how the priest must face. Fr. Fessio is an authority in this area, very much in union with Rome, not for rad-Trads, etc. Here’s a piece he wrote:no, it’s not. it is a bunch of priests violating the current GIRM. why don’t they just put on some skirts and dance around while they’re at it? what’s the difference? isn’t there something wrong with saying ‘wow, that’s the kind of abuse i like to see.’ not following instructions is not following instructions. when it comes to the celebration of the Mass, either do what you are told or do nothing.
i just don’t get it. why do people on these forums compete, one heterodoxy against another. does nobody listen to the vatican?
Deo Gratias!He’s not allowed to say the TLM when there’s a church (St. Josaphat) right there that offers it? Thats strange. The priests, especially Fr. Kosnac have all been pretty good so far (in my opinion) though they sure have enough of them for 1 church (I’ve seen 4 different priests and 2 bishops say it so far…maybe thats why).
Back on topic, those are lovely pictures and from what I’ve heard the priest is well liked. Maybe they need more like him saying the 1970 Mass. A couple more like him and we could have a movement on our hands .
paragraph 158 in the GIRM.Ah, so the Bishop in Alabama was…lying?..misinformed?..just wanted to pull a power trip?..what?
I understand bishops can make rules for their diocese, but the article implied he was citing a “Church law.”
158 Next, facing the altar, the priest says inaudibly: May the body of Christ bring me to everlasting life, and reverently consumes the body of Christ. Then he takes the chalice, saying inaudibly: May the blood of Christ bring me to everlasting life, and reverently drinks the blood of Christ.
The report wasn’t cited wasn’t official. Anyhow, the issue has been settled by the CDWS: www.unavoce.org/protocol2036.htmHow do they get away with celebrating the new Mass Ad Orientem? I thought that was forbidden by Church law?
“Most of the Mass was in English. Bishop David E. Foley of Birmingham officiated facing toward the congregation, after having decreed a month before the ceremony that Mass ad orientem (“toward the East” – with the priest facing the same direction as the people) is forbidden by Church law.”
Is the good bishop wrong or are the priests in Detroit wrong?
assumptiongrotto.com/misc_events/2-20/suhy//Thumb_PICT0067_resize.JPGparagraph 158 in the GIRM. 158 Next, facing the altar, the priest says inaudibly: May the body of Christ bring me to everlasting life, and reverently consumes the body of Christ. Then he takes the chalice, saying inaudibly: May the blood of Christ bring me to everlasting life, and reverently drinks the blood of Christ.
JNB said: