Big Thinkers: Michio Kaku - Theory Of Everything

  • Thread starter Thread starter IWantGod
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Michio Kaku is a brilliant man. However, a theory is an educated guess based on scientific suppositions. The Theory of Everything is of yet, not provable. I kind of hope that it remains a mystery I really don’t want my faith or belief in God to be supplanted by science. Do you? Peace.
 
Michio Kaku is a brilliant man. However, a theory is an educated guess based on scientific suppositions. The Theory of Everything is of yet, not provable. I kind of hope that it remains a mystery I really don’t want my faith or belief in God to be supplanted by science. Do you? Peace.
I certainly would not like my faith to be supplanted. But i think this fear that science will someday render Christianity as being nothing more than a remnant of age old superstition is really a fallacy invented by hard-line Atheists.

Even if t a theory of everything was provable, that theory wouldn’t explain everything. It wouldn’t explain where the laws of nature come from or why there is something rather than nothing at all.
 
Science and faith are like peanuts and chocolate, or peanut butter and jelly; they go well together. Most people would not be fearful of losing their faith, but this is NOW. How will it be in the future as we become more materialistic and attuned to science? I don’t know the answers and I don’t think unproven theories can provide them. I just prefer the mysteries of the cosmos, to believe as I believe and to pray as I pray. There isn’t any conflict in that. Peace.
 
Who’s afraid of bubbles? If it can not be falsified by the scientific method, it is not science. But perhaps the scientific community could possibly make exceptions for one of their own but never for others?

I don’t see how his theory can be falsified because I can’t visualize him demonstrating its explanatory and predictive capability on to another observable universe. Can someone smarter help me out as to what is required for his theory to be proven correct?
 
Lord help us…so many itching ears, although we have so many treasures in our One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic faith!

Father, Son, and Holy Spirit…have mercy on us,

Blessed Mother Mary…pray for us
 
Michio Kaku is a brilliant man. However, a theory is an educated guess based on scientific suppositions. The Theory of Everything is of yet, not provable. I kind of hope that it remains a mystery I really don’t want my faith or belief in God to be supplanted by science. Do you? Peace.
Respectfully, you are Mistaken. A hypothesis is an educated guess. A theory takes a lot of research and testing. A theory, especially of everything, will take thousands of years of testing and retesting. You are right, Science of this sort removes Faith from the equation, and I am not prepared to do that!
 
Why is that? Do you really have a good reason not to consider him as one of the best scientists.
 
I don’t think he has faith. I know that Neil deGrasse Tyson is openly atheistic and the virtually scathes anybody who is theistic especially on Biblical principles NDT says that science can fix all problems, even if science created the problem in the first place. This is classic atheism, putting God out of the way and putting man in the central position.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top