Birth Control on the Wane

  • Thread starter Thread starter HagiaSophia
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
H

HagiaSophia

Guest
More Women Opting Against Birth Control, Study Finds

At a time when the medical community has been heartened by a decline in risky sexual behavior by teenagers, a different problem has crept up: More adult women are forgoing birth control, a trend that has experts puzzled – and alarmed about a potential rise in unintended pregnancies.

Buried in the government’s latest in-depth analysis of contraceptive use was the finding that the number of women who had sex in the previous three months but did not use birth control rose from 5.2 percent in 1995 to 7.4 percent in 2002. That means that as many as 11 percent of all women are at risk of unintended pregnancy at some point during their childbearing years (ages 15 to 44).

Researchers at the National Center for Health Statistics took pains to point out that the “increase is statistically significant” and that the “apparent change merits further study.” Other analysts called the spike a troubling development that translates into at least 4.6 million sexually active women at risk of conceiving a child they had not planned on.

Because the survey is so large (more than 7,600 women) and known for its accuracy, “an increase of even two percentage points is worrisome,” said John S. Santelli, a professor of population and family health at the Mailman School of Public Health at Columbia University. Even as he cheered the news that a growing number of teenagers are using contraception, Santelli wondered whether doctors are neglecting women.

“Maybe we’re failing with women over 21,” Santelli said.

Although unintended pregnancies can be welcome surprises, the danger from a public health and societal standpoint is that many of the women are financially or psychologically unprepared for parenthood at that point in their lives.

The number of unintended pregnancies “is a very difficult concept to measure accurately,” said James Trussell, director of the Office of Population Research at Princeton University and an authority on contraceptive trends.

In analyzing previous reports by the National Center for Health Statistics, Trussell has determined that half of all unintended pregnancies occur among the more than 95 percent of women who used some type of contraception, probably because the method failed or was used improperly. That means the other half of unintended pregnancies came from the sliver of the population not using birth control.

“That is why this is of enormous concern,” he said in an interview. “This tiny minority contributes half of all unintended pregnancies.”

The data come from one-on-one interviews with 12,500 women and men ages 15 to 44. Government interviewers, who spent an average of 85 minutes with each person, found that 98 percent of women reported using contraception during their reproductive years, and the pill was the most popular choice, followed by female sterilization – usually by having their fallopian tubes tied. Female respondents were also asked about their partners’ use of birth control methods, such as condoms.

The December report did not tabulate unintended pregnancies, though preliminary information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found a slight increase in the birth rate in 2003, most notably in women older than 30.

Physicians, statisticians and advocates who specialize in reproductive health had several theories for the rise in unprotected sex. They pointed to possible factors such as gaps in sex education, the cost of birth control, declining insurance coverage, fears of possible side effects of contraceptives and personal attitudes about childbearing.

washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45599-2005Jan3.html?nav=rss_topnews
 
Yes, an interesting article, but do you have a question or possibly some comments to make?
 
It’s an awful article. While it relays good news, it does it in a negative light, in that pregnancy is a bad thing that should be controlled; that most people who would get pregnant would be emotionally/financially unprepared for it.
 
Hagia:

Was there a point you were trying to make with the post? Although the article does not break out the number of women in this large study group who were married, I hardly would greet this as ‘good news’ IF large numbers of unmarried women are abstaining from BC but not sexual activity.
 
40.png
ppcpilot:
It’s an awful article. While it relays good news, it does it in a negative light, in that pregnancy is a bad thing that should be controlled; that most people who would get pregnant would be emotionally/financially unprepared for it.
You have to keep in mind who is being quoted in the article: some of these people aren’t for a surge in reproduction for various reasons - others perhaps see abortions rising as a result of unintended pregnancy and it appears that while they spend a great deal of money in this field, either women are ignoring or failing to “get” their point. I also thought it interesting that after so many years of “we don’t intend to have children at all” - 0 growth population and duplicating “only ourselves” there appears to be a tendency for some women at least, to rethink the “contraceptive” society.
 
It’s an instructive article about how weird we really are in this world. It simply never occurred to the author that there are people out there who are married and open to life, but not necessarily actively ‘trying’ to have a child.

Not only is it not worth addressing, it appears to be a subject not even thought of!
 
I doubt they surveyed married couples.

Anyway, you know why those other people are supposedly using BC less? Because they figure, oh, I don’t need to bother will “safety”, I can just go and kill my kid if the “unthinkable” should happen! And I’ll do it with other people’s money, too! :rolleyes:

And the best line in the article: “Even as he cheered the news that a growing number of teenagers are using contraception…” :nope:
 
Stephen Mills:
Yes, an interesting article, but do you have a question or possibly some comments to make?
I have some comments. That’s EASILY the most biased and slanted article I’ve read in 2005. I can’t believe that rubbish got past an editor. Then again, it is the Washington Post. The is a perfect example of the writer dictating his or her values through his or her writing. Either this writer knows nothing of Natural Family Planning or doesn’t want to write about its CLEAR effects in this area.

It’s wonderful news that fewer women are contracepting. The news is exciting. Too bad we get it in that light. I’ll be on the lookout for a more middle-of-the-road AP article.
 
Judie Brown responded to the article:

"Well, the Washington Post has done it again. The resident Chicken Littles of the Culture of Death are flailing away, alarmed and aghast that more American women have decided to just say no to drugs.
*
What? Rejecting drugs is a good thing, isn’t it? Well, not if you’re the Washington Post, and not if the drug is the birth control pill. You see, a new government study shows that fewer women are using contraception. In a front page article this week, the Post trotted out the usual gang of suspects to admonish the foolish females who’ve opted to give their bodies a break from the steroids and side effects that are part and parcel of life on the pill.
*
Reporter Ceci Connolly offers as uncontested fact the statement that in the United States there are “34 million women in need of contraceptive services — those who are not sterilized, pregnant or trying to conceive.” Define “need,” please, Ms. Connolly. One needs oxygen. One needs fruits and vegetables. One needs clothing and shelter. But how is it that one needs a chemical whose sole purpose is repression of a perfectly normal physical function?
*
“…In fact, sexual relationships among the unmarried have become so commonplace that the “experts” cited in the Washington Post are so absorbed in this reality that they can only proclaim the “need” for improved birth control. The concept of quantifying the moral decay inherent in accepting sex without accountability? Such thoughts are utterly absent from their commentaries, and are considered strictly the realm of “extremists” such as yours truly.
*
Society has come to view pregnancy as if it were indeed a disease — or at least a condition to be avoided and prevented at all costs, and “cured” (i.e., aborted) if it somehow develops. It is not too surprising, then, that in Contraception World, there has developed a total rejection of responsibility for the actions taken. Some call this scenario keeping in tune with the times; but the facts reveal something sinister and, in a spiritual sense, deadly.”

washingtondispatch.com/article_10641.shtml
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top