R
Rosalinda
Guest
‘Cardinal Ratzinger and the Church should butt out of medicine of which they know nothing about…’ Such was the statement made this morning during the coffee and donuts session after the celebration of the Divine Liturgy. As calmly as a kindly as I could I asked the my fellow parishionner could he give an example as to when the Catholic Church formally condemned some medical practice on which it later changed its teaching? (Earlier in the conversation my point in defense of our new Pope was that his job is not to change doctrine but he claimed indeed the church had already changed doctrine.)
His example was the blue babies controversy in the 1950’s about which he had recently seen a movie, “God Created It”. Apparently a doctor was excommunicated by the church for performing corrective surgery on the heart of a blue baby in U.S and saving his life after he had been forbidden. Well, this was a new one for me. While I couldn’t speak to the particulars of the case I suggested the Church may have been applying the principle that extraordinary means to save a life if the attempt is futile, experimental and cause for unnecessary pain is not required. I asked how many babies died before this technique was perfected. He claimed it was never experimental surgery as numerous trials had been tested on animals. Supposedly, the first baby who received this surgical intervention made an instanteous, miraculous recovery. Now that is a leap in faith.
I suggested it would be more appropriate to talk about medical ethics issue of today but he was adamant this case proves the Church was mistaken back then so they have no authority today to speak. I told him I’d get back to him.
Has anybody seen this movie or remember this controversy about blues babies?
His example was the blue babies controversy in the 1950’s about which he had recently seen a movie, “God Created It”. Apparently a doctor was excommunicated by the church for performing corrective surgery on the heart of a blue baby in U.S and saving his life after he had been forbidden. Well, this was a new one for me. While I couldn’t speak to the particulars of the case I suggested the Church may have been applying the principle that extraordinary means to save a life if the attempt is futile, experimental and cause for unnecessary pain is not required. I asked how many babies died before this technique was perfected. He claimed it was never experimental surgery as numerous trials had been tested on animals. Supposedly, the first baby who received this surgical intervention made an instanteous, miraculous recovery. Now that is a leap in faith.
I suggested it would be more appropriate to talk about medical ethics issue of today but he was adamant this case proves the Church was mistaken back then so they have no authority today to speak. I told him I’d get back to him.
Has anybody seen this movie or remember this controversy about blues babies?