M
marineboy
Guest
I figured I would start a new thrEad to clear up some misconceptions about what I wrote, in my previous thread, on Bob Sungenis—My main point is and was, that Bob’s statement , “I would not say that it is an impossibilty that someone who is not(water) baptized cant get to heaven.” While technically he is saying that one can be saved who is not water baptized (thus affirminG baptism of desire) his approach is very sloppy in this statement… What if someone where to say --“I would not say that the Catholic church doesnt teach that Mary remained a virgin her entire life.” Of course you wouldnt say that–cauSe it is clear the Church teaches that Mary remained a virgin her entire life. the statement seems to imply that one could Argue the opposite–Sungenis’s statement also gives that impression-at least in my opinion it does–it implies one could argue that water baptism is alwAys necessary—which is simply not the teaching of the Church–(THAT’S FEENEYISM) Bob is very precise he should know better— these other clowns may let you get away with it–but not me BOBBY!!! NOT ME!!