C
Catholic_Opinion
Guest
Yesterday’s post about the International Theological Commission publishing its document on limbo called to mind the distinction between an official document of the magisterium and an advisory document that the Holy See has given permission to publish.
Lots of advisory documents get written and, while permission to publish them does signal at least a somewhat favorable attitude toward their contents, it does not invest them with teaching authority.
But what about advisory documents that aren’t given permission to be published? What happens to them?
Normally, they vanish into the mists of the night and are forgotten.
BUT NOT THIS TIME.
EXCERPT:
Breaching normal protocol, several participants in a 2005 Vatican-sponsored conference over the ethics of declaring someone brain dead have published the papers they delivered at the debate.
Many of the papers reproduced in “Finis Vitae: Is Brain Death Still Life?” argue that the concept of brain death was devised mainly to expand the availability of organs for transplant and claim that some patients who had been pronounced brain dead continued to live for months or even years.
Publication of the papers, which the Vatican had decided not to publish, is evidence of the strong feelings about brain death held by a minority of the members of the Pontifical Academy for Life.
Roberto De Mattei, vice president of the National Research Council of Italy who is not a member of the academy, said he edited “Finis Vitae” in order “to expand the debate and bring it to a wider audience.”
More…
Lots of advisory documents get written and, while permission to publish them does signal at least a somewhat favorable attitude toward their contents, it does not invest them with teaching authority.
But what about advisory documents that aren’t given permission to be published? What happens to them?
Normally, they vanish into the mists of the night and are forgotten.
BUT NOT THIS TIME.
EXCERPT:
Breaching normal protocol, several participants in a 2005 Vatican-sponsored conference over the ethics of declaring someone brain dead have published the papers they delivered at the debate.
Many of the papers reproduced in “Finis Vitae: Is Brain Death Still Life?” argue that the concept of brain death was devised mainly to expand the availability of organs for transplant and claim that some patients who had been pronounced brain dead continued to live for months or even years.
Publication of the papers, which the Vatican had decided not to publish, is evidence of the strong feelings about brain death held by a minority of the members of the Pontifical Academy for Life.
Roberto De Mattei, vice president of the National Research Council of Italy who is not a member of the academy, said he edited “Finis Vitae” in order “to expand the debate and bring it to a wider audience.”
More…