Britain First condemned by UK Churches

  • Thread starter Thread starter CopyBoy
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

CopyBoy

Guest
Far-right political party Britain First has been criticised by every major Christian denomination in the UK, according to the Huffington Post today.
The group recently held a “Christian Patrol” in Luton, during which members brandished wooden crosses and claimed to be defending “Christian values” while handing out anti-Islam newspapers to Muslims.
Although the march and others like it have only attracted marchers in their tens, a video of the Luton patrol has been viewed more than 21 million times on Facebook.
As stated on its website, Britain First’s first principle is a commitment to “the maintenance of British national sovereignty, independence and freedom”. It campaigns primarily against mass immigration, and its rhetoric repeatedly calls for a return to ‘Christian culture’.
christiantoday.com/article/britain.first.condemned.by.uk.churches/78170.htm
 
Christianity and Christendom is awakening to the dangers facing it.
 
It’s extremely painful for any Christian when the name of Jesus Christ is hijacked to justify hatred and to spread fear and mistrust. It is actually a kind of blasphemy."
What is more painful is that certain religions actually do blaspheme in their teachings about Jesus. These are just some protestors who don’t represent in a meaningful way the Christian Faith. They aren’t the actual leaders of religions which are blasphemous.

Jesus also taught us to be wise as serpents. It seems most Christian leaders have ignored this teaching.
 
Christianity and Christendom is awakening to the dangers facing it.
Shouldn’t be necessary in the First World.

As UK atheist commentator Pat Condell recently remarked “the immigration crisis will lead to vigilante justice and tribal warfare”.

Looks like some the pagan secularists may get their way after all, only, they won’t be at the top of the food chain just because of a degree from Oxford or Cambridge.

In fact, if it does come to tribal warfare, Neo-nazis and radical Islam will rule the day, I’m afraid.
 
Jesus also taught us to be wise as serpents. It seems most Christian leaders have ignored this teaching.
👍👍👍

That’s really what I have been saying! But the First World left doesn’t want to have an honest conversation about it!

Some of them seem to think any kind of talk of not letting certain people in must be somehow rooted in ancient racism, colonialism or the African (not any other, naturally :rolleyes:) slave trade. Or that people just don’t people who look different, namely along the lines of dress and skin color.

And it seems like a real chore to report them for crimes, namely rape.

What’s really telling though if all of this illegal activity is done on the surface or even in broad daylight…just think of what goes on their communities, especially the ones the police won’t go into! I’m thinking along the lines of FGM and child sex abuse…but I guess not looking racist or islamphobic is more important.

And the rise of extremist groups will only get worse if the police won’t do their jobs.

It reminds me of when John the Baptist sensed the hearts of the Pharissees and scribes, and he called them a “brood of vipers”, at least in the translation I’ve read.

Just think of how un-PC, unequal and discriminatory by today’s standards it was to exclude them! :rolleyes:
 
Shouldn’t be necessary in the First World.
It becomes necessary when the leaders in the West refuse to defend their nations borders, language and culture.
As UK atheist commentator Pat Condell recently remarked “the immigration crisis will lead to vigilante justice and tribal warfare”.

Looks like some the pagan secularists may get their way after all, only, they won’t be at the top of the food chain just because of a degree from Oxford or Cambridge.

In fact, if it does come to tribal warfare, Neo-nazis and radical Islam will rule the day, I’m afraid.
So blame the victim?

We wouldn’t need Christian groups like this if our governments would do their jobs. We are being pushed into more base ways of defending the West and our faith because our politicians seem to think that all civilizations are equal, they have the same values and can live together. Well, the people that have to live among this mess, not those academics living in their ivory towers, know better. They see the folly of this mass immigration and the end of Western civilization as we know it if it continues…
 
This group will not help anything. If you want to isolate and encourage the next generation of young Muslims to look into extremism, go right ahead and throw your hate at them. It will make it much easier for them to hate you back.
 
So blame the victim?
Nope. People have a right to protect themselves. I’m just saying that is what will happen if the police will not do their jobs.
 
Even if it means doing something non-PC, uncool and considered by some to be racist and islmophobic like securing borders and regulating immigration?

Or is that too high of a price? :eek: 🤷
 
What exactly is a no-go zone? If it is a place where a person who doesn’t want to be insulted, assaulted, robbed, or murdered shouldn’t go then such places exist all over the world. Such places usually are especially dangerous for people based on certain characteristics like sex, race or religion. They are the kind of place where honest police will ask an outsider what they are doing there realizing the danger. We have such a place in my city.

The existence of these places is often dismissed with an appeal to the true claim that one can go there and not fall prey. But the claim isn’t that if you go there you will absolutely experience something the negative. The claim is that such places are unsafe for specific people. Something bad is much more likely to happen. The basic concept of unsafety seems like an uncontroversial claim that is completely accepted when the topic is privileged underprivileged classes.
 
I’m curious about how they deliberately provoked a scene. Is walking around with a cross provocative? Is handing out literature provacative? If so why? It seems the me the only reason it is considered provocative is because this was a Muslim neighborhood. So the reason it is provacative is because Muslims can have their neighborhoods where their culture and religion is protected but the native British can’t. That doesn’t make any sense to me. But that is relativism. All cultures are equal and worthy of protection except European Christian.
 
Someone sent me the video of the Britain First group walking handing out their leaflets. The Muslims were none too happy with them. They were tossing “F” bombs at them left and right. Telling them they were going to take over England and Islam is going to rule over them. The cops had to step in to protect them from the Muslim mob. Europe needs to wake up before it’s too late.

There is also a video of a Christian convert from Islam being attacked while trying to preach the gospel to Muslim people in Dearborn, Michigan. The cops arrested him not the vicious mob. Also there are plenty of YouTube videos of sharia patrols.
 
I don’t disagree that it is provocative. But if it is then the British have every reason to not want to allow immigrants who find their culture provocative. But for some reason in the west it is only westerners who aren’t allowed to be provoked, especially into stemming massive immigration and most especially as a response against actual violence not a peaceful if provocative march.

Both groups are Christian by virtue of baptism. It seems to me similar to how both Sunnis and Shiites are Muslims. Both the words European and Christian have meaning. Joining them together doesn’t make them incomprehensible.
 
From our own Attorney General -
Speaking at Muslim Advocate’s 10th anniversary dinner, Lynch said since the terrorist attacks in Paris last month, she is increasingly concerned with the “incredibly disturbing rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric … that fear is my greatest fear.”
The fear that you have just mentioned is in fact my greatest fear as a prosecutor, as someone who is sworn to the protection of all of the American people, which is that the rhetoric will be accompanied by acts of violence. My message to not just the Muslim community but to the entire American community is: we cannot give in to the fear that these backlashes are really based on.
Lynch made it clear that she shares those concerns, but vowed to use the DOJ to protect Muslims from discrimination and violence. Noting the rise in violence against Muslims and mosques in the wake of the Paris attacks, Lynch added that, “When we talk about the First amendment we [must] make it clear that actions predicated on violent talk are not American. They are not who we are, they are not what we do, and they will be prosecuted.”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top