Brother Sun and Sister Moon?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dymphna82
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Dymphna82

Guest
I just received a prayer card from my mom, since she went to the feast of St. Francis. The back of the card has a simplified version of the Canticle of Brother Sun and Sister Moon of St. Francis of Assisi. It goes a bit like this:
Most High, all-powerful, all-good Lord, All praise is Yours, all glory, all honour and all blessings.
To you alone, Most High, do they belong, and no mortal lips are worthy to pronounce Your Name.
Praised be You my Lord with all Your creatures,
especially Sir Brother Sun,
Who is the day through whom You give us light.
And he is beautiful and radiant with great splendour,
Of You Most High, he bears the likeness.
Praised be You, my Lord, through Sister Moon and the stars,
In the heavens you have made them bright, precious and fair.
Praised be You, my Lord, through Brothers Wind and Air,
And fair and stormy, all weather’s moods,
by which You cherish all that You have made.
Praised be You my Lord through Sister Water,
So useful, humble, precious and pure.
Praised be You my Lord through Brother Fire,
through whom You light the night and he is beautiful and playful and robust and strong.
Praised be You my Lord through our Sister,
Mother Earth
who sustains and governs us,
producing varied fruits with coloured flowers and herbs.
Praise be You my Lord through those who grant pardon for love of You and bear sickness and trial.
Blessed are those who endure in peace, By You Most High, they will be crowned.
Praised be You, my Lord through Sister Death,
from whom no-one living can escape. Woe to those who die in mortal sin! Blessed are they She finds doing Your Will.
No second death can do them harm. Praise and bless my Lord and give Him thanks,
And serve Him with great humility.
Now, being a former Pagan, this prayer ind of bugs me. Help!
 
I just received a prayer card from my mom, since she went to the feast of St. Francis. The back of the card has a simplified version of the Canticle of Brother Sun and Sister Moon of St. Francis of Assisi. It goes a bit like this:

Now, being a former Pagan, this prayer ind of bugs me. Help!
Rest assured, St. Francis was no pagan. Still, since it goes against your sensibilities, feel free to choose another devotion for yourself. 🙂
 
There’s a word to describe it, but they’re only…“allegorical” brother/sisters. Like saying such a person was my Brother, even though we’re not related at all.
 
It is poetic language. They are “brother” and “sister” in the sense that they, like we, are created by God.
 
The poem is an art! It weaves the thoughts of a personified element of nature. The personified element calls all the other elements of nature (e.g. moon, sun, wind, etc), “brothers” and “sisters”. Indeed, all are siblings because they all have one Father, the Creator, God, Our God.

St. Francis has put in a poem the praise:
“Holy, Holy, Holy Lord
God of Power and Might
Heaven and Earth are full of your glory
Hosannah in the highest!”

Heaven and Earth glorifies our Father and we as human beings should learn from Nature how God is Good, Mercy and Justice.

There is nothing wrong about the poem. Even pagan cultures and beliefs are amazing approximations (with outright wrong perspectives) to the Truth that is our Faith.
 
There’s a word to describe it, but they’re only…“allegorical” brother/sisters. Like saying such a person was my Brother, even though we’re not related at all.
I just received a prayer card from my mom, since she went to the feast of St. Francis. The back of the card has a simplified version of the Canticle of Brother Sun and Sister Moon of St. Francis of Assisi. It goes a bit like this:

Now, being a former Pagan, this prayer ind of bugs me. Help!
The Canticle of Brother Sun is neither allegory nor poetry. It is a summary of three theological treatises that St. Francis preached. The Canticle was not written at one time. They were three sermons. As he was approaching death, Francis asked Brother Leo to help him write this message. He was trying to be concise.

There are two problems here.

First: The sermons are not available, because a fire destroyed the originals. We have an oral tradition that tells us more or less, what was in them.

Second: The canticle was written in Italian, not Latin. Francis did not like using Latin, because he wanted everyone to be able to read his writings. The problem is that Br. Leo did not write well in Italian. At the time, Italian was in its embryonic stage. Thirteenth century Italian does not translate well into modern English. This was the first piece of literature written in Italian. Leo had no model to guide him. Francis dictated and Leo has to give it body.

The original treatise is based on the Canticle of Daniel. Francis preaches how all things give praise to their Creator, because they are destined to do so. He also draws from the story of creation to point out how each detail of creation is an act of love.

The second treatise is another homily in which Francis points to God’s eternal presence in human history. He points to the fact that Creation foreshadows the Incarnation. Everything in creation speaks to us about one of God’s attributes. If you look at each of the attributes given to the different creatures, they are all meant to draw your attention to the divine attributes. God is not a static God, but a dynamic God. He is alive and yet unchanging. This was very important, because there were two schools of theology that were both heretical. One insisted that God was static, so much so that he is indifferent to human life. The other insisted that God must be in constant change, because one of the signs of a living being is growth. Francis sets the argument to rest by pointing to nature. The qualities of God do not change. Therefore, God is not in a constant state of growth. At the same time, God not only breaks into human history at the moment of creation, but he creates history so that everything in the universe reflects its maker. Therefore, God is not a static point, but a living being who has been present before the beginning of history, who makes his presence felt through his creation and who breaks into human history as a man, at the moment of the Incarnation.

The third moment in the Canticle is about life itself. It’s probably the first formal pro-life statement made by a spiritual master. Francis calls man to acknowledge that life is sacred, but it must be lived on God’s terms, not our terms. Therefore, he proceeds to write the last part, which is brief, but very profound. He will crown those who live according to his plan, which is to live in peace. Those who are in conflict with God, as are those who want to live life according to their terms, are in great moral danger. Francis concludes by reminding his audience that the final judgment is real and that no one can escape it. Therefore, we must choose to live life on God’s terms or on our terms.

The use of Brother and Sister is not allegory. It is theology. Francis did not use “Brother” or “Sister” as symbols or allegories. Throughout his life, he preaches that all things come from God who is Father. Everything is related by its origin, even though all things are different by their nature. A man is not a rock. A cat is not a goose and so forth. But the man, the rock, the cat and the goose all come into existence because the Creator says one word, “Son.”

Francis goes back to Genesis and notices that the write states, “And God said . . .” This begged the question. What did God say?

Francis goes to the Gospel of John. “In the beginning was the Word . . . and all was created through him.”

All was created through the Son.

But the Son is the first born, among many brothers.

Therefore, all things are related to each other through the Son who is our first-born brother.

For this reason, Francis always calls everyone and everything, Brother or Sister.

If you observe, he understood the Sonship of Jesus and the fraternal relationship with creation so well that even his priests were not allowed to use the title Father. They were all Brother. The laity who did not know the difference between priests gave used that title. Today, it is accepted, because it’s harmless as long as we never forget that all of creation proceeds from the hand of the same Father, through the Son. However, man is the only creature into whom the Spirit breathes divine life.

So, when you read the Canticle of Brother Sun, reflect on the qualities of God who is Father. The next time that you look up at the moon lighting a dark night, remember what Francis taught us. It is God who shines in the darkness and so forth.

That’s the theology of the Canticle of Brother Sun.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Thanks Br. Jay!! 😃
This was the best, most concise description of theology of the Caticle of the Sun I have ever read.

Being the “Ignatius junkie” that I am, I am seeing a lot of similarities and parallels between Franciscan & Ignatian spiritualities,
or is that just because I favor the “dark side” (what my secualr priest friends call my love of anything Jesuit!)😃
 
Thanks Br. Jay!! 😃
This was the best, most concise description of theology of the Caticle of the Sun I have ever read.

Being the “Ignatius junkie” that I am, I am seeing a lot of similarities and parallels between Franciscan & Ignatian spiritualities,
or is that just because I favor the “dark side” (what my secualr priest friends call my love of anything Jesuit!)😃
You’re welcome. I had to rush throgh it, because I had to go to Compline. Please forgive the typos.

In the liturgy of October 4 the Church prays, "Holy Father, you made your servant Francis a perfect follower of your Son . . . "

And in one fo the collects she prays, “Father, you helped our seraphic Father Francis become the perfect image of Christ . . .” And in the canon for Oct 4 she prays, “You exalted Francis to the heights of evangelical perfection”

If we believe that the Church teaches as she prays, then it would be reasonable to say that all saints are going to have overlaps, because they all seek to be perfect Christians. And if to date, Francis is the one saint who did it best, then it stand to reason that one can see a little of every saint in Francis and Francis in every saint. They’re all trying to get to the same place, the imitation of Christ. It’s not a comeptition, but a common journey that Francis and Ignatius share.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
St. Francis, besides talking about Brother Sun, Sister Moon, Brother Wolf, etc., also referred to his own body as Brother ***** (pardon my use of symbols, but the censor won’t let it thru otherwise; also keep in mind that this refers to the long-eared animal).

If his body was as recalcitrant as mine is, I can dig it.
 
The Canticle of Brother Sun is neither allegory nor poetry. It is a summary of three theological treatises that St. Francis preached. The Canticle was not written at one time. They were three sermons. As he was approaching death, Francis asked Brother Leo to help him write this message. He was trying to be concise.

There are two problems here.

First: The sermons are not available, because a fire destroyed the originals. We have an oral tradition that tells us more or less, what was in them.

Second: The canticle was written in Italian, not Latin. Francis did not like using Latin, because he wanted everyone to be able to read his writings. The problem is that Br. Leo did not write well in Italian. At the time, Italian was in its embryonic stage. Thirteenth century Italian does not translate well into modern English. This was the first piece of literature written in Italian. Leo had no model to guide him. Francis dictated and Leo has to give it body.

The original treatise is based on the Canticle of Daniel. Francis preaches how all things give praise to their Creator, because they are destined to do so. He also draws from the story of creation to point out how each detail of creation is an act of love.

The second treatise is another homily in which Francis points to God’s eternal presence in human history. He points to the fact that Creation foreshadows the Incarnation. Everything in creation speaks to us about one of God’s attributes. If you look at each of the attributes given to the different creatures, they are all meant to draw your attention to the divine attributes. God is not a static God, but a dynamic God. He is alive and yet unchanging. This was very important, because there were two schools of theology that were both heretical. One insisted that God was static, so much so that he is indifferent to human life. The other insisted that God must be in constant change, because one of the signs of a living being is growth. Francis sets the argument to rest by pointing to nature. The qualities of God do not change. Therefore, God is not in a constant state of growth. At the same time, God not only breaks into human history at the moment of creation, but he creates history so that everything in the universe reflects its maker. Therefore, God is not a static point, but a living being who has been present before the beginning of history, who makes his presence felt through his creation and who breaks into human history as a man, at the moment of the Incarnation.

The third moment in the Canticle is about life itself. It’s probably the first formal pro-life statement made by a spiritual master. Francis calls man to acknowledge that life is sacred, but it must be lived on God’s terms, not our terms. Therefore, he proceeds to write the last part, which is brief, but very profound. He will crown those who live according to his plan, which is to live in peace. Those who are in conflict with God, as are those who want to live life according to their terms, are in great moral danger. Francis concludes by reminding his audience that the final judgment is real and that no one can escape it. Therefore, we must choose to live life on God’s terms or on our terms.

The use of Brother and Sister is not allegory. It is theology. Francis did not use “Brother” or “Sister” as symbols or allegories. Throughout his life, he preaches that all things come from God who is Father. Everything is related by its origin, even though all things are different by their nature. A man is not a rock. A cat is not a goose and so forth. But the man, the rock, the cat and the goose all come into existence because the Creator says one word, “Son.”

Francis goes back to Genesis and notices that the write states, “And God said . . .” This begged the question. What did God say?

Francis goes to the Gospel of John. “In the beginning was the Word . . . and all was created through him.”

All was created through the Son.

But the Son is the first born, among many brothers.

Therefore, all things are related to each other through the Son who is our first-born brother.

For this reason, Francis always calls everyone and everything, Brother or Sister.

If you observe, he understood the Sonship of Jesus and the fraternal relationship with creation so well that even his priests were not allowed to use the title Father. They were all Brother. The laity who did not know the difference between priests gave used that title. Today, it is accepted, because it’s harmless as long as we never forget that all of creation proceeds from the hand of the same Father, through the Son. However, man is the only creature into whom the Spirit breathes divine life.

So, when you read the Canticle of Brother Sun, reflect on the qualities of God who is Father. The next time that you look up at the moon lighting a dark night, remember what Francis taught us. It is God who shines in the darkness and so forth.

That’s the theology of the Canticle of Brother Sun.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
You really are the best you know? Thanks a lot for that 😃
 
My mother always said, “You’re a real piece of work, you know.” 😃

Just before she sent me to my room.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
LOL.

Thank you, thank you, for explaining this to me. You have done God and I a great service, taking the time out to do so. 🙂 God bless.
There is nothing wrong about the poem. Even pagan cultures and beliefs are amazing approximations (with outright wrong perspectives) to the Truth that is our Faith.
Aye. In Paganism, I’m very used to “Mother Earth”, Moon Goddess, Sun God, and each of the elements being masculine of feminine, air and fire being masculine, and water and earth being feminine, sometimes even being personified as such.

So you are right, there is truth to that but it misses the mark. Still, nature are not gods.
 
All this is why I wish the CBW III version of Haugen’s “Canticle of the Sun” didn’t read:
Praise **to **the Sun
Praise **to **the Wind
etc.

Isn’t it supposed to be praising God for these things and not praising the things themselves?
 
Jesus did say, “Ye are gods”.
Actually, Jesus was quoting a psalm (not inventing his own saying) and neither was referring to nature but to people (who are created in the likeness of God).
 
I just received a prayer card from my mom, since she went to the feast of St. Francis. The back of the card has a simplified version of the Canticle of Brother Sun and Sister Moon of St. Francis of Assisi. It goes a bit like this:

Now, being a former Pagan, this prayer ind of bugs me. Help!
I did an essay on St Francis’ view of nature for Art class… in one of the books I used for research, it said that the reason St Francis spoke this way of creation is not to worship the creation, but because he saw it as a reminder of God who is the Creator. This is a view that contradicts the Gnostics (who say that the physical world is evil) - and even the Jansenists I guess - it’s showing respect for creation for the right reason, to know the Creator. It’s for His sake. It’s different than paganism for that reason.

God bless
 
My mother always said, “You’re a real piece of work, you know.” 😃

Just before she sent me to my room.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
:extrahappy::clapping:

Mama knew best, didn’t she? When I saw this thread, I thought, "Just wait 'til Brother JR gets here, we will have a dissertation on the subject. :eek: Saved by the Compline bell… Always am enlightened and/or educated by many of your posts. :thankyou:
 
LOL.

Thank you, thank you, for explaining this to me. You have done God and I a great service, taking the time out to do so. 🙂 God bless.

Aye. In Paganism, I’m very used to “Mother Earth”, Moon Goddess, Sun God, and each of the elements being masculine of feminine, air and fire being masculine, and water and earth being feminine, sometimes even being personified as such.

So you are right, there is truth to that but it misses the mark. Still, nature are not gods.
In the Romance languages, there are no neuters. Everything is masculine or feminine, because they are rooted in Latin. Luna is moon, which is feminine. Sole, is sun, which is masculine.

As I explained, Francis sees our commong origin from the hand of the Father. That’s the key here. God is Father. Every creature, animate or inanimate speaks about the Father. It is not the Father. There is only one Father.
Jesus did say, “Ye are gods”.
All this is why I wish the CBW III version of Haugen’s “Canticle of the Sun” didn’t read:
Praise **to **the Sun
Praise **to **the Wind
etc.

Isn’t it supposed to be praising God for these things and not praising the things themselves?
If you look at how Francis wrote the Canticle is says, "Praise my Lord for . . . "

Remember I said that there is a problem? In Italian the word is “per” which in English can mean “for” or “through”

One has to be very careful to translate it as Francis said it. “Praise my Lord FOR Brother Sun”

It is not “Praise my Lord THROUGH Brother Sun”. We know this from the previous sermons that he gave on Genesis and from the context. His theology is that every created thing points to its creator. Aquinas would pick up on this theme later and use it as part of his explanation for the existence of God.

Fraternally,

Br. JR, OSF 🙂
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top