Cal. Legislature Approves Same Sex Marriage

  • Thread starter Thread starter dts
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
This is shameful. The Franciscans who founded the missions must be rolling in their graves.
 
How dare they ignore the will of the people! :mad: Californians already voted for Proposition 22, which defines marriage as being between one man and one woman.

Californians, I urge you all to contact Governor Schwarzenegger and urge him to veto this bill!
You can e-mail Governor Schwarzenegger at:
govmail.ca.gov/
 
I, for one, am very disappointed in our Democratic-run legislature. Yes, they are ignoring the will of the people, doing what ever they can to by-pass what was decided by popular vote! :mad:
 
40.png
Tonks40:
I, for one, am very disappointed in our Democratic-run legislature. Yes, they are ignoring the will of the people, doing what ever they can to by-pass what was decided by popular vote! :mad:
Click to expand...
I am not from California. I lived in SF for three years and have followed the state quite closely since the 1970’s. This ability to ignore the will of the people does not supprise me. In California it seem to be cronic.

The Democratic-party-run legislature in California and other states have records of pushing laws that are contrary to the will of the people.

Before anyone flames me many of the Republican-party-run legislatures are not always better. We as a people need to learn more about the people we elect to lead us.
 
I just heard on 1530AM in Sacramento that the Governor vetoed it… citing Prop 22.
 
40.png
Courtneyjo:
Here’s the article.

breitbart.com/news/2005/09/07/D8CFPOB00.html
Click to expand...
article:
“Any girlie man could have vetoed this legislation,” she said, referring to a term Schwarzenegger used previously to mock Democratic legislators. “A real man demonstrating real leadership as governor of the most populous state in the nation would have chosen a different course of action.”
Click to expand...
I was really curious if Ahnold was going to use this phrase.

You know, these people don’t listen to themselves. Any girlie man could possibly veto it, I suppose, but the chances are astronomical that one would.

The funny thing is they seem to think that the term “girlie man” is a liability to the governor, when I think it may just be they are giving him some free publicity.

Alan
 
40.png
Jeffrey:
I just heard on 1530AM in Sacramento that the Governor vetoed it… citing Prop 22.
Click to expand...
According to FOX at 8:30 eastern time this morning 9/8/05 it WILL be vetoed when the governor gets it. As it should be as the people of the state have stated in PROP 22 that marrage is one man and one woman.
 
40.png
Tonks40:
I, for one, am very disappointed in our Democratic-run legislature. Yes, they are ignoring the will of the people, doing what ever they can to by-pass what was decided by popular vote! :mad:
Click to expand...
I don’t know you’d be disappointed. Ignoring the will of the people on issues such as gay marriage is SOP for the such activists, who enjoy the overwhelming support of the Democratic Party.

– Mark L. Chance.
 
40.png
AlanFromWichita:
I was really curious if Ahnold was going to use this phrase.

You know, these people don’t listen to themselves. Any girlie man could possibly veto it, I suppose, but the chances are astronomical that one would.

The funny thing is they seem to think that the term “girlie man” is a liability to the governor, when I think it may just be they are giving him some free publicity.

Alan
Click to expand...
The last time Arnold used the phrase “girlie man,” he was accused of “homophobia.” :rolleyes: But when a homosexual activist uses the phrase…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top