L
LovelyLadybug
Guest
I know those babies never get a chance to be baptized or a chance to pray because they die before they are born. But this isn’t their fault. Can they still go to heaven? Any thoughts on this? Thanks!!!
One certainly hopes so.I know those babies never get a chance to be baptized or a chance to pray because they die before they are born. But this isn’t their fault. Can they still go to heaven? Any thoughts on this? Thanks!!!
1261 As regards children who have died without Baptism, the Church can only entrust them to the mercy of God, as she does in her funeral rites for them. Indeed, the great mercy of God who desires that all men should be saved, and Jesus’ tenderness toward children which caused him to say: “Let the children come to me, do not hinder them,”[63] allow us to hope that there is a way of salvation for children who have died without Baptism. All the more urgent is the Church’s call not to prevent little children coming to Christ through the gift of holy Baptism. (source)
This makes sense, thanks. It would be so sad for those babies to not go to heaven. It isn’t their fault they weren’t baptized or never got to pray. Nevertheless, it is very sad that those babies die in the womb. We must pray that they go to heaven & for an end to abortion.Truth is, we don’t know. But I can’t imagine innocent little babies going anywhere but heaven.
This is a beautiful explanation.We do not know if the most newly ensouled person prays. Prayer is more that saying the Our Father.
Children are conceived with the stain of original sin. The Church teaches us the normative means to remove original sin is valid baptism.
Outside of that, we trust God. I had a baby die before birth. No even attempt at baptism, I was not Catholic so it would not have crossed my mind.
After years of prayer and study, I am at peace knowing that person, my child, is enfolded in God’s mercy. If that means their soul does not have the beatific vision, that is the best. If they are in heaven, that is best. If they are in hell, that is still best because God is far more compassionate than I can ever be. I trust Him.
Some speculate this, and if this is true, it is hard to think that any of them would choose against God — they have never had any temptation, life experience or disordered appetites, concupiscence, or siren call from the secular world, to choose otherwise. Kind of like a blank slate on which, all of a sudden, appears a loving and almost irresistible invitation to choose God and salvation. What could be easier?Maybe God gives them a test a little bit like the angels had?
My thought, if all who die before the age of reason are saved, why would we baptize infants?
I would differentiate “theology” from theological constructs. that, and a whole lot of Catholics (pre and post Vatican 2) have had a somewhat minimal grasp on theology, so we have and have had Catholics of good and earnest faith who are less than particularly knowledgeable. And I will let God sort that all out.Catholics who accept traditional moral and sacramental theology, and evangelicals who divide mankind into the “saved” and the “lost” and see only one path to being “saved”, would be exceptions to this.
I’m not at all clear where you were going with this. I was attempting to illustrate that people in modern society are very fond of gentle, pleasant, tolerant assumptions — “puppies and rainbows” — about anything touching on faith or morals. It is not at all pleasant to think of unbaptized babies being forever shut out of heaven for something that wasn’t their fault. Neither is it pleasant to think of someone as being damned forever for “not accepting Jesus as their Lord and personal Saviour”.Catholics who accept traditional moral and sacramental theology, and evangelicals who divide mankind into the “saved” and the “lost” and see only one path to being “saved”, would be exceptions to this.