Can anyone explain the logic behind the stance of SSPX?

[pnewton]

The quesstion of disobedience was brought up. What did the SSPX find objectionable? I am giving you an example.

This is a non sequiteur. “Objectionable” and “obedience” are not the same thing and they have nothing to do with each other, unless you think for some reason that the Lefebvre was ordered to have a clown Mass. The answer to “The SSPX were disobedience” is not “Yeah, but there was clown Mass.”

 

[catharina]

This is a non sequiteur. “Objectionable” and “obedience” are not the same thing and they have nothing to do with each other, unless you think for some reason that the Lefebvre was ordered to have a clown Mass. The answer to “The SSPX were disobedience” is not “Yeah, but there was clown Mass.”

Yup.

PS - saw your new thread.
You’re a brave one.
Bless you!