Can Catholics Proselytize?

  • Thread starter Thread starter in_servitude
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I

in_servitude

Guest
I was at a church meeting last night, and a deacon said that we are not supposed to proselytize. Meaning, we should not proselytize non-Catholics to become Catholic.
pros·e·lyt·ize/ˈpräsələˌtīz/
Verb:
Code:
Convert or attempt to convert (someone) from one religion, belief, or opinion to another.
Advocate or promote (a belief or course of action): "Davis wanted to proselytize his ideas".
I assume that is bunk (so no need to convince me that it’s ok - but do let me know if you think it is correct proselytizing is to be avoided). Where can I find a refutation in official church teachings? I don’t intend to be combative - but just have my facts together if I’m in a similar situation down the road.
 
I was at a church meeting last night, and a deacon said that we are not supposed to proselytize. Meaning, we should not proselytize non-Catholics to become Catholic.

I assume that is bunk (so no need to convince me that it’s ok - but do let me know if you think it is correct proselytizing is to be avoided). Where can I find a refutation in official church teachings? I don’t intend to be combative - but just have my facts together if I’m in a similar situation down the road.
Hope this helps:
This from the CDF provides some insight:

Oxford Dictionaries
indifferentism, noun: the belief that differences of religious belief are of no importance.
proselytize, verb: [with object] convert or attempt to convert (someone) from one religion, belief, or opinion to another: the program did have a tremendous evangelical effect, proselytizing many

Doctrinal Note On Some Aspects Of Evangelization (2007)
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith

III. Some ecclesiological implications
  1. However, the Church’s “missionary proclamation is endangered today by relativistic theories which seek to justify religious pluralism, not only de facto but also *de iure *(or in principle)”.[30] For a long time, the reason for evangelization has not been clear to many among the Catholic faithful.[31] It is even stated that the claim to have received the gift of the fullness of God’s revelation masks an attitude of intolerance and a danger to peace.
    Code:
         Those who make such claims are overlooking the fact that the  fullness of the gift of truth, which God makes by revealing himself to man,  respects the freedom which he himself created as an indelible mark of human  nature: a freedom which is not indifference, but which is rather directed  towards truth.  This kind of respect is a requirement of the Catholic faith  itself and of the love of Christ; it is a constitutive element of evangelization  and, therefore, a good which is to be promoted inseparably with the commitment  to making the fullness of salvation, which God offers to the human race in the  Church, known and freely embraced.
IV. Some ecumenical implications
In addition, there is evangelization in countries where non-Catholic Christians live, including those with an ancient Christian tradition and culture. In this context, what is required is both true respect for the tradition and spiritual riches of such countries as well as a sincere spirit of cooperation. Catholics, “avoiding every form of indifferentism or confusion, as well as senseless rivalry, through a common profession of faith in God and in Jesus Christ before all peoples – insofar as this is possible – may collaborate with their separated brethren in social, cultural, technical and religious matters in accordance with the Decree on Ecumenism”.[45]

Ecumenism does not have only an institutional dimension aimed at “making the partial communion existing between Christians grow towards full communion in truth and charity”.[46] It is also the task of every member of the faithful, above all by means of prayer, penance, study and cooperation. Everywhere and always, each Catholic has the right and the duty to give the witness and the full proclamation of his faith. With non-Catholic Christians, Catholics must enter into a respectful dialogue of charity and truth, a dialogue which is not only an exchange of ideas, but also of gifts,[47] in order that the fullness of the means of salvation can be offered to one’s partners in dialogue.[48] In this way, they are led to an ever deeper conversion to Christ.

In this connection, it needs also to be recalled that if a non-Catholic Christian, for reasons of conscience and having been convinced of Catholic truth, asks to enter into the full communion of the Catholic Church, this is to be respected as the work of the Holy Spirit and as an expression of freedom of conscience and of religion. In such a case, it would not be a question of proselytism in the negative sense that has been attributed to this term.[49]

[45] Second Vatican Council, Decree Ad gentes, 15.

[46] John Paul II, Encyclical Letter Ut unum sint (25 May 1995), 14: AAS 87 (1995), 929.

[47] Cf. ibidem, 28: AAS 87 (1995), 939.

[48] Cf. Second Vatican Council, Decree Unitatis redintegratio, 3 and 5.

[49] The term proselytism originated in the context of Judaism, in which the term proselyte referred to someone who, coming from the gentiles, had passed into the Chosen People. So too, in the Christian context, the term proselytism was often used as a synonym for missionary activity. More recently, however, the term has taken on a negative connotation, to mean the promotion of a religion by using means, and for motives, contrary to the spirit of the Gospel; that is, which do not safeguard the freedom and dignity of the human person. It is in this sense that the term proselytism is understood in the context of the ecumenical movement: cf. The Joint Working Group between the Catholic Church and the World Council of Churches, “The Challenge of Proselytism and the Calling to Common Witness” (1995).
vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_20071203_nota-evangelizzazione_en.html
 
This document is a bit confusing. But, the key elements for me are:
It is also the task of every member of the faithful, above all by means of prayer, penance, study and cooperation. Everywhere and always, each Catholic has the right and the duty to give the witness and the full proclamation of his faith.
More recently, however, the term proselytize] has taken on a negative connotation, to mean the promotion of a religion by using means, and for motives, contrary to the spirit of the Gospel; that is, which do not safeguard the freedom and dignity of the human person.
So, we are to share the faith - but do it in a spirit that is consistent with the spirit of the Gospel.
 
The Church doesn’t really use the term “proselytize” in official Church documents. As the excerpt above says, the word has pretty negative connotations nowadays.

I tend to say we are called to evangelize, not proselytize. Proselytism carries connotations of imposing our beliefs and trying to force people to convert. Evangelization is about proposing our beliefs and inviting people to conversion. It’s an important distinction.

But, yeah, if you just go by the dictionary definition, proselytizing and evangelizing sound interchangeable.
 
The Church doesn’t really use the term “proselytize” in official Church documents. As the excerpt above says, the word has pretty negative connotations nowadays.

I tend to say we are called to evangelize, not proselytize. Proselytism carries connotations of imposing our beliefs and trying to force people to convert. Evangelization is about proposing our beliefs and inviting people to conversion. It’s an important distinction.

But, yeah, if you just go by the dictionary definition, proselytizing and evangelizing sound interchangeable.
The Church certainly prefers- especially in the case of the laity- an invitational tone. You’d be surprised how many people are just looking for an invitation: e.g., to attend the Mass or an RCIA program: they are already disposed to hear, listen or consider but what they feel they need is a formal invitation from a member of the community: they already have a disposition to believe and, in such cases, it is no longer an intellectual matter, and if we act like it is we can inadvertently turn people off, as it were. These people, internally or as it were secretly, won’t understand why we are pressing the credulity of the faith upon them. These people will ask questions as they come up: we just need to be willing to listen and understand and, hopefully, at least direct them to the competent sources or people who can provide them with the answers they are seeking.
 
I was at a church meeting last night, and a deacon said that we are not supposed to proselytize. Meaning, we should not proselytize non-Catholics to become Catholic.

I assume that is bunk (so no need to convince me that it’s ok - but do let me know if you think it is correct proselytizing is to be avoided). Where can I find a refutation in official church teachings? I don’t intend to be combative - but just have my facts together if I’m in a similar situation down the road.
“Can” and “should” are two different things. Can we proselytize? Of course we can! Anyone can proselytize. Should we? I agree with the deacon, we should not. A lot of us are caught in this “counter-reformation” mindset that we need to respond to what the Protestants are doing by doing to them what they are doing to us. We should focus on true conversion, because proselytizing isn’t a good way to get converts anyway. They might convert, but chances are they won’t be firm in the faith and will highly probably fall away from the faith not long after.
 
“Can” and “should” are two different things. Can we proselytize? Of course we can! Anyone can proselytize. Should we? I agree with the deacon, we should not. A lot of us are caught in this “counter-reformation” mindset that we need to respond to what the Protestants are doing by doing to them what they are doing to us. We should focus on true conversion, because proselytizing isn’t a good way to get converts anyway. They might convert, but chances are they won’t be firm in the faith and will highly probably fall away from the faith not long after.
Do you agree with the CDF when it says:
It is also the task of every member of the faithful, above all by means of prayer, penance, study and cooperation. Everywhere and always, each Catholic has the right and the duty to give the witness and the full proclamation of his faith.
?

I would like to hear how you’d go about “true conversion.” Is it done by simply sharing your faith and gifts?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top