B
Ben_Sinner
Guest
Alot of people give their own interpretations of the Bible because it is so esoteric. Us Catholics believe that the Church infallibly defines what scripture actually means.
This leads me to another question that has been bugging me though.
Are the Church’s explanations esoteric as well and can’t be taken at face value?
I have this fear that there is a possibility that the Church could speak esoterically when declaring a Dogma that might seem cut and dry to the average person, but the leaders of the church may have their own mystic language.
So these thoughts cause me to wonder if I can trust what the Church says at face value. How can I put an end to this doubt? I’m just assuming that things like “Jesus was fully divine” literally means he was fully man and not a part of some “Christ Consciousness” that many Eastern mystics claim him to be.
This leads me to another question that has been bugging me though.
Are the Church’s explanations esoteric as well and can’t be taken at face value?
I have this fear that there is a possibility that the Church could speak esoterically when declaring a Dogma that might seem cut and dry to the average person, but the leaders of the church may have their own mystic language.
So these thoughts cause me to wonder if I can trust what the Church says at face value. How can I put an end to this doubt? I’m just assuming that things like “Jesus was fully divine” literally means he was fully man and not a part of some “Christ Consciousness” that many Eastern mystics claim him to be.