Can the logical naturalist-agnostic believe that anything is true?

  • Thread starter Thread starter seductus_sum
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Spock said:
Now what we could talk about is the level of evidence which we use to accept some of our hypotheses as “properly” founded. It is a very subjective matter, the same amount of evidence is sufficient for some, and insufficient for others. Also we could talk about the nature of direct evidence, and the indirect evidence.
Click to expand...
I look forward to it. 🙂

When oh when to start the threads… and which?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top