M
Maximus1
Guest
Servants of the PARCELATE was 1947. That takes you beyond your 1960 theory.( Which I now will remind).
My conjecture that Servants of the PARCELATE did not constitute on the exact day it was established is one of reason. So we move back furthur into the 1940s to account for recognition of need, a decision, funding, etc.
In law we deal with concealment with legal presumptions and shifting of burdens. Concealment has been proven institutionally in more than one Judicial proceeding. We know the shape and extent. It is disingenuous to argue " lack of" from a circumstance of expansive concealment. This concealment was sprinkled with threat of excommunication and therefore eternal punishment( which must be viewed from the perspective of the believer).
There was also practice of making families outcast. Group pressure, I alluded to earlier.
Now, how big was this problem? It existed at the institutional and local level on every Continent. In virtually all major cities and many minor ones. The claims have been documented. Where there are free courts, there have been judgements. Criminal prosecutions, government investigations.
The 60s you mentioned happened to represent a time when the institution itself was succeptible to discovery, for the first time.
There is the MEMO. the one taken from a Vatican vault and authenticated in court.
That memo was sent to Bishops worldwide from the Vatican. It contained specific instructions to be kept in vaults and shared with no one.
It instructed on how to capture potential claimants via Penance, and it’s surrounding practice. A misdirection. It clearly created a quasi-judicial intra Church procedure. It was to create a procedure that made it seemed to victims something was " being done"
The truth was the system of transfers and moving priests continued. And after, anyone who still chose to go to authorities on claims like statutory rape, were excommunicated.
These are just basics. The detail is chilling and very real.
I grew up in a Diocese in NY. I went back to review the lawsuits and they would exceed the word limit of this OP. My familiarity offered a chance for insight. This Diocese would take about an hour the drive around the perimeter. It was so many parishes!
Then I reviewed data of lawsuits worldwide. The scope was breathtaking.
We forget the internet and cable is new. It is not a search for thr truth to close your mind pre- 1960, based on this type of available data.
Those people at LOVE CANSL had been dying from the Benzine for some time before the corporate secret was uncovered. And it bankrupt private law firms to find the truth at all. The first were dissolved. The truth built on their work.
My conjecture that Servants of the PARCELATE did not constitute on the exact day it was established is one of reason. So we move back furthur into the 1940s to account for recognition of need, a decision, funding, etc.
In law we deal with concealment with legal presumptions and shifting of burdens. Concealment has been proven institutionally in more than one Judicial proceeding. We know the shape and extent. It is disingenuous to argue " lack of" from a circumstance of expansive concealment. This concealment was sprinkled with threat of excommunication and therefore eternal punishment( which must be viewed from the perspective of the believer).
There was also practice of making families outcast. Group pressure, I alluded to earlier.
Now, how big was this problem? It existed at the institutional and local level on every Continent. In virtually all major cities and many minor ones. The claims have been documented. Where there are free courts, there have been judgements. Criminal prosecutions, government investigations.
The 60s you mentioned happened to represent a time when the institution itself was succeptible to discovery, for the first time.
There is the MEMO. the one taken from a Vatican vault and authenticated in court.
That memo was sent to Bishops worldwide from the Vatican. It contained specific instructions to be kept in vaults and shared with no one.
It instructed on how to capture potential claimants via Penance, and it’s surrounding practice. A misdirection. It clearly created a quasi-judicial intra Church procedure. It was to create a procedure that made it seemed to victims something was " being done"
The truth was the system of transfers and moving priests continued. And after, anyone who still chose to go to authorities on claims like statutory rape, were excommunicated.
These are just basics. The detail is chilling and very real.
I grew up in a Diocese in NY. I went back to review the lawsuits and they would exceed the word limit of this OP. My familiarity offered a chance for insight. This Diocese would take about an hour the drive around the perimeter. It was so many parishes!
Then I reviewed data of lawsuits worldwide. The scope was breathtaking.
We forget the internet and cable is new. It is not a search for thr truth to close your mind pre- 1960, based on this type of available data.
Those people at LOVE CANSL had been dying from the Benzine for some time before the corporate secret was uncovered. And it bankrupt private law firms to find the truth at all. The first were dissolved. The truth built on their work.
Last edited: