W
Wonko_the_Sane
Guest
rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2009/01/pell-as-new-prefect-for-bishops.html
I read this article on Rorate Caeli, and I thought it was pleasant news.
However, there were a few comments that disturbed me.
Here’s one of them:
Anonymous:
John L:
Does anyone know what these people are going on about?
I read this article on Rorate Caeli, and I thought it was pleasant news.
However, there were a few comments that disturbed me.
Here’s one of them:
And another:Pell going to the Congo for Bishops! Well where isn’t he going - Westminster? CDF? Liturgy? Every time a vacancy pops up Pell’s name is mentioned. However the thought that he might have anything to do with the appointment of bishops makes me shudder. Let us look at some of those appointed during his “watch” + Bradley, +Pourteous, +Grech.
If Pell were appointed to the Bishop’s Congregation we may well see bishops being replaced with Lay Executives on six figure salaries for such is his practice in the Corporation (formerly the Arch Diocese) of Sydney.
As for the suggestion that he is an “arch - consevative” it takes more than a few statements and the odd bit of dressing up to ern that title.
John L:
Am I missing something? I always thought my Bishop was vey conservative, and loved him for it.Pell is undoubtedly not an archconservative. From what I can figure out he believes in people who will not rock the boat. What he woudl do in Rome is hard to say - especially since we don’t know the program the Pope would ask him to promote. I think he is loyal and would obey the Pope’s orders more or less.
Does anyone know what these people are going on about?