Hey Benedict! We meet again on a forth forum!
Anyway, to answer the question, I will post a response that I had given to a Protestant asking the same question.
I am somewhat new to the study of this doctrine, but I think that I have a sufficient understanding to try to explain it. Needless to say, my understanding isn’t perfect (though that also is true for all Christian doctrine).
Now, am I going to give a highly technical explaination, and hinge my arguement on some distant theoretical concept? I certainly hope not, and I will try to be very concise. So concise in fact that I could explain deification in one word. Grace.
Grace is a participation in the life of God. Through Grace, we are able to receive God’s love and love Him in return.
Let’s take a second though to look at what we do NOT mean when we say deification.
- We do not mean that man becomes equal to God, nor possessing any of His attributes or perfections in their full degree. We do not become Truth Itself, nor omnipotent or omniscience.
- Neither do we mean that we become part of God as the Buddhists do, our essenses dispersing into some sort of big Ocean of “godness”.
Greg, I want to break down the selection that you bolded. btw, this is a quote from St. Thomas Aquinas in the 13th Century.
(The only-begotten Son of God), (wanting to make us sharers in his divinity), (assumed our nature), (so that he, made man, might make men gods).[81]
- (The only-begotten Son of God) I am sure that this part is fine with both you and Joe.
- (wanting to make us sharers in his divinity) This is repeating what was stated in 2 Peter 1 that I had quoted earlier that Christ wants to make us sharers in His divine nature. (I will also present more Scripture at the end of my post.)
2 Peter 1: (bold added)
3 As all things of his divine power which appertain to life and godliness are given us through the knowledge of him who hath called us by his own proper glory and virtue.
4 By whom he hath given us most great and precious promises:
that by these you may be made partakers of the divine nature: flying the corruption of that concupiscence which is in the world.
- (assumed our nature) This is just basic Christology clearly defined at the Council of Chalcedon in 451 but firmly believed by the orthodox Faith from its beginning. I don’t think that this is a point of contention, so I will leave it.
- (so that he, made man, might make men gods). I am assuming that this is the what is causing the problem as point 2 was shown to be taken directly from Scripture. However, I don’t suppose that you really disagree with it, but that you have never been confronted with it before. I am not aware that Protestantism denies this article of the Faith. As for the phrase that men might be gods, thus is also taken directly from Scripture.
Psalm 81: (bold added)
1 A psalm for Asaph. God hath stood in the congregation of gods: and being in the midst of them he judgeth gods.
2 How long will you judge unjustly: and accept the persons of the wicked?
3 Judge for the needy and fatherless: do justice to the humble and the poor.
4 Rescue the poor; and deliver the needy out of the hand of the sinner.
5 They have not known nor understood: they walk on in darkness: all the foundations of the earth shall be moved.
6 I have said:
You are gods and all of you the sons of the most High.
7 But you like men shall die: and shall fall like one of the princes.
8 Arise, O God, judge thou the earth: for thou shalt inherit among all the nations.