Catechism does not support homosexual ‘lifestyle’, says cathedral rector

  • Thread starter Thread starter gilliam
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
G

gilliam

Guest
South Bend, Jul. 01, 2005 (CNA) - The rector of St. Matthew Cathedral in South Bend disagrees with his fellow priest’s assertion that homosexual orientation is “a beautiful part of God’s plan” and “a healthy act of God and nature.”

Fr. Michael Heintz wrote a response in the South Bend Tribune to Fr. Edward Reutz’s June 23 contribution to Michiana Point of View.

“Despite Ruetz’s assertion that Jesus ‘never condemned the lifestyle,’ there is a clear and constant teaching within the Scriptures and the Catholic tradition in opposition to homosexual activity,” Fr. Heintz pointed out.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church, he said, is clear on homosexuality.

“While the Church certainly distinguishes between homosexual orientation (which I believe is not, in the vast majority of cases, something chosen by an individual) and homosexual activity (which I believe is intrinsically disordered and also within the capacity of an individual freely to choose), those who are homosexual are encouraged and supported by the Church and its sacraments to live — no less than heterosexual individuals are — a chaste life,” wrote Fr. Heintz.

The rector said the Church calls all people, regardless of sexual orientation, to holiness.

“There is ample evidence in early Christianity that this call was taken quite seriously and that there were certain ‘lifestyles’ and even occupations which were considered simply incompatible with the Gospel,” Fr. Heintz wrote.

“There is no doubt that Jesus reached out to those on the fringes of society,” he concluded. “But at the same time it is equally clear that he invited those whom he touched to entrust themselves to him and to emend their lives; that call is no less real — and no less demanding — today.”

catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=4282
 
Could someone 'splain to me why so many PRIESTS and RELIGIOUS defy Catholic teachings on THIS subject? You don’t hear priests talking against other Catholic teachings but homosexuality seems to get a ‘pass’ among some.

Is their ox being gored? Is it friendship with homosexuals? No priest would say alcoholism, mental illness or drug addiction was part of God’s ‘beautiful’ plan. No priest should be supportive and positive about unhealthy and sinful behavior.

What gives?
Lisa N
 
  1. Many (most?) are homosexuals
  2. Most were taught in the 60s-80s in seminary that homosexual behavior was a sin that could be overlooked.
  3. Many are or were sexually active homosexuals as priests.
 
gilliam said:
1. Many (most?) are homosexuals
  1. Most were taught in the 60s-80s in seminary that homosexual behavior was a sin that could be overlooked.
  2. Many are or were sexually active homosexuals as priests.
So just becuase they are homosexuals they can preach against church beliefs, doctrine(sp?) etc.? No wonder the church has major issues!
 
One more question…when priests publically speak out in support of these (gay rights etc.) do the people they answer to just pretend it never happened…or are they held accountable and we just dont hear about it??
 
40.png
Karin:
So just becuase they are homosexuals they can preach against church beliefs, doctrine(sp?) etc.? No wonder the church has major issues!
yep
 
40.png
Karin:
One more question…when priests publically speak out in support of these (gay rights etc.) do the people they answer to just pretend it never happened…or are they held accountable and we just dont hear about it??
Most priests report to the bishop of their local diocese. If you don’t hear anything from the bishop a few things could be happening:
  1. the bishop is trying to handle it ‘quietly’
  2. the bishop agrees with the priest
  3. the bishop has other political fish to fry
 
40.png
gilliam:
Most priests report to the bishop of their local diocese. If you don’t hear anything from the bishop a few things could be happening:
  1. the bishop is trying to handle it ‘quietly’
  2. the bishop agrees with the priest
  3. the bishop has other political fish to fry
Ok then the Bishops (not all of them) are just as corrupt as the priests (not all of them) that they are supposed to oversee. Does this reach higher up into the Church hierarchy? Or does it stop at this lower level?
 
I am hopeful that Pope Benedict XVI will be a bit firmer than beloved JP II. Apparently because of his experience with communists who used the homosexual label to demonize supposed enemies of the state, JP II was not as proactive against the lavender mafia as he might have been.

Why haven’t we LEARNED from the multi million dollar priest scandal? Homosexuals have cause untold damage to the Church yet we have priests talking about how ‘beautiful’ this ‘gift’ is? 'Scuse me while I hurl

Lisa N
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top