Catholic Church's stance on individualism

  • Thread starter Thread starter owoeizme
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
O

owoeizme

Guest
I’m trying to write an ethics paper and I want to argue against the concept of my own personal good is the supreme good and I was wondering if the Catholic Church has ever formally taught against this form of thinking. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
 
Approach with natural law.

As someone that is still learning my faith, I sometimes go with Protestant writings. CS Lewis’ Mere Christianity could be a good place to start.
 
Read Pope St. John Paul II’s encyclical:

Centesimus Annus

It discusses subsidiarity.

Also, do a search HERE on Catholic Answers Forums for Centesimus Annus because some contributors and posters have done wonderful research.

Centesimus annus (Latin for “hundredth year”) is an encyclical which was written by Pope John Paul II in 1991 on the hundredth anniversary of Rerum novarum, an encyclical issued by Pope Leo XIII in 1891. It is part of a larger body of writings, known as Catholic social teaching, that trace their origin to Rerum novarum and ultimately the New Testament.

It was one of fourteen encyclicals issued by John Paul II. Cardinal Georges Cottier, Theologian emeritus of the Pontifical Household and Cardinal-Deacon of Santi Domenico e Sisto, the University Church of the Pontifical University of Saint Thomas Aquinas, Angelicum,[1][2] was influential in drafting the encyclical.[3]
 
The following may be a bit broad but puts things in context:

The Holy Father says:
Code:
"If we cannot have common values, common truths, sufficient communication on the essentials of human life–how to live how to respond to the great challenges of human life–then true society becomes impossible."
Commentary by the Practical Catholic:

How true this is. Where there is no communication, no culture, no shared experience, there is no society; because there is no people. There remains only a vast and foreboding, unforgiving sea of individuals ready to crash upon each other and the world with the slightest wind. Without a common basis, we have not the vaulted pluralism we’re taught to embrace, but Babel, in all the confusion and madness of a society with no binding forces. Already we are seeing the tensions of this fragmentation breaking out across cultures.

“Without common values and truths, such as in the socieites we find ourselves in, we find the fabric of society torn like Joseph’s cloak, by a great many tribes which would like to lay claim to the title of favored. Leftists, conservatives, anarchists, nihilists, secularists, objectivists, the shallow, the entertainers, the entertained, all vying for control against each other. Tribalism can indeed spawn differentiation, but without some common ground, and in the face of increasing jargon not only in the academies but in the cultures; we shall be left with madness. In the end this tribalism can only result in the decline of all their claims, and the alienation of one from the other. Babel is the happenstance when society tries to become God.”

Pope Benedict XVI goes on to say:
Code:
"We are moving toward a dictatorship of relativism which does not recognize anything as for certain and which has as its highest goal one’s own ego and one’s own desires. The church must defend itself against threats such as “radical individualism” and “vague religious mysticism”. [emphasis added]
Commentary by the Practical Catholic:

“Pope Benedict does not play language games, he is unconcerned with the postmodernist’s corner on untruth. Neither should we be. Notice how he calls relativism a “dictatorship” instead of agreeing that no values and no Truth are the way forward for society. What many fail to recognize is that imposing nihilism and arbitrary tribalism is a form of dictatorship. Where untruth or half truth is the common order, there can only be oppression. Political correctness has asked us to abandon our value-laden language and to pick up a new language proper to the secular forum. However, this secular newspeak is value-laden against the traditional claims of the Western world and as such, is a poison rather than a new order. We can and should bring our own conviction laden language to the table, if we’re going to have any sort of real dialogue at all. Misinformation and restrained convictions are not the proper building blocks for a democracy.”

Ed
 
Approach with natural law.

As someone that is still learning my faith, I sometimes go with Protestant writings. CS Lewis’ Mere Christianity could be a good place to start.
Arguable, C.S. Lewis’s writings are Catholic! He was a devout Anglican, and that places him outside the ground of Protestantism. He almost converted, but for various reasons remained in the Anglican tradition.

The Church, however, does speak against but also for individualism. Individualism is a philosophical concept that can have various definitions, but the Church, as supreme communicator between Christ and earth, can only accept individualism within the realms of Her teaching as that is truth. Anything outside of that would be error.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top