2
2014taylorj
Guest
The other day, I was watching Patrick Coffin, interview Bishop Gracida. In the interview, the two men seemed to be in agreement, that it is possible that Pope Francis may not have been elected validly, due to the activities of the “saint gallen mafia”, in the 2013 conclave.
Moreover, Bishop Gracida, believed that council of some sort composed of cardinals should be set up to determine whether the 2013 election was valid. This left me really confused since I was under the impression, that not believing or doubting whether a pope is the pope places, you outside of full communion with the church. Essentially, what I would like to know, is how is it that their opinion does not place them outside of full communion with the church, whereas it does for sedevacantists?
Moreover, Bishop Gracida, believed that council of some sort composed of cardinals should be set up to determine whether the 2013 election was valid. This left me really confused since I was under the impression, that not believing or doubting whether a pope is the pope places, you outside of full communion with the church. Essentially, what I would like to know, is how is it that their opinion does not place them outside of full communion with the church, whereas it does for sedevacantists?