I donāt know what a ādirge paceā means. I, for one, am not very taken with hymns that are like something Lawrence Welk would have played, all jumpy and hard to sing.
Itās hard to express this, but some hymns have stood the test of time, just as is the case with good art or good literature. Some is best forgotten and usually is, fairly quickly. To me, the desirable characteristics of a hymn in church are:
-Is it reverent? That doesnāt necessarily mean slow. One of my favorites is āFrom this World of Sin and Sadnessā, which is Russian and pretty sprightly in its pace. But itās also reverent.
-Is the melody attractive? Lots of newer hymns are not attractive, being almost like a demonstration of technical prowess. How many time can you get the choir to repeat a partial verse or change the key?
-Is the melody logical? Does the last note seem to ācall forā the next? Or are they seemingly random?
-Is it āsingableā? Lots of the old protestant hymns and Catholic āethnicā hymns are eminently āsingableā. Lots of the newer ones are just hard to sing.