For what it is worth, I was a practicing Catholic when I started TM about 35 years ago. My ex-wife, still a staunch Catholic still practices it. It changed my life. I started because I had grave concerns about my mental stability, being prone to fits of anger that I tended to take out on my two infant boys. I had to do something, or I knew that I would do them harm. Prayer and moral codes seemed to have no effect on my behavior. I took the brief introduction, not paying much attention to the philosophy behind it.
Three days after my first sitting my wife asked me what had happened. I asked her what she meant. She said that my behavior both with her and the boys had changed dramatically. I seemed far calmer and more tolerant in situations that would have set me off. She started the practice two weeks after I did, and even studied to become one of the people who “checks” the use of the technique.
There were no compulsions to study, learn, or know oft he philosophy other than the original presentation of the origins of the technique. The simplicity of the “meditation” is remarkable, and has no religious or philosophical overtones of itself. One could learn it, use it, and walk away from the organization having all the benefits of the technique.
Some months later, curious about the alleged physiological changes said to happen as a result of the relaxing nature of the method, I happened to volunteer for an EKG demonstration. Having practiced for a while it was easy for me, unbeknownst to anyone, to slip into the technique while being wired to the machine. When the lecturer at last looked at the display indicating my heart function she suddenly stopped talking. She said, slowly, to the audience, “As you can see, this man has an unusually slow and steady heartbeat…”
I can honestly say that if one wants to go and trudy the philosophy behind the technique, that is available. But as far as learning, using, and benefiting from the technique, that is not a religious or philosophical matter, save in the honoring and gratitude offered to those who discovered and promoted the technique. I think that in a school situation that would be minimized. In the last analysis, it is simply a way of taking advantage of a known response of the body to a particular mental technique that has of itself no religious or philosophical necessity attached to it.