Catholicism in the '60s and '70s

  • Thread starter Thread starter RubyAndOnyx
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

RubyAndOnyx

Guest
Hello! I’m in the process of writing a book set in England in the 1960s and ‘70s. My Catholic main characters’ relationships with their faith and the Church are a major focus, and I’d like to be as accurate as possible. What I’m asking here is, essentially, what was different then? Major things (Latin Mass, etc.) would be lovely, but I’d also welcome any small details that you think might help me.

And, for a more specific question: Was abstaining from meat on all Fridays common practice outside of the U.S.? The Americans I’ve spoken to tend to have great stories associated with that (tuna hot dogs, anyone?) but I’m not sure if it was part of the British Catholic experience.

Thanks in advance!
 
And, for a more specific question: Was abstaining from meat on all Fridays common practice outside of the U.S.? The Americans I’ve spoken to tend to have great stories associated with that (tuna hot dogs, anyone?) but I’m not sure if it was part of the British Catholic experience.

Thanks in advance!
I lived in the U.K. in the 50’s. The meat abstinence was very much observed on all Fridays. Within the Polish community, it was observed on Christmas Eve as well.
 
I grew up in the Midwest (Kansas City, MO to be exact). My grandparents and my parents clashed over the “traditional” and the “new” forms of worship. My parents and their friends belonged to a group called “Community One”, which celebrated Mass in the basements or rec rooms of various churches or convents, a different one every week or so, using such radical innovations as guitars and English rather than Latin.

The funny part is that most of us kids who grew up with it loved it, but later in life gravitated to more traditional forms of worship - basically we all preferred the “upstairs” to the basement! 😃
 
This was a time of great tumult in the Church. Vatican-2 ran from 1962-1965, and was badly misunderstood due to a lot of misinformation (some of it deliberate). Catholics were told (and believed) that it was now OK to use birth control, that premarital sex was not such a big deal, drugs were fine as long as we didn’t do anything harmful to others, and lots of other bunk. In many instances, this misinformation was deliberate, to try to compel the Church to accept these ideas because they were so widely believed, and opposing them would be considered unpopular (which is exactly how that went down, but the Church would never allow Her doctrine to be dictated by lies told to the Faithful).

There were lots of actual changes, many of which were unpopular. Mass in the vernacular is the biggest. New architechural giudelines caused many Parishes to be gutted of many beautiful statues, paintings, windows, etc, and artistically magnificent churches were transformed overnight to resemble sparse protestant worship halls. Altar rails were removed, and people began to receive Communion while standing. The “final Gospel” was removed from the end of the Mass (the first few verses of the Gospel of John).

This era saw the establishment of a charismatic movement within Catholicism - the first (and only) time a movement of protestant origin was accepted by large numbers of the Faithful. The modern “folk Mass” came out of this hippie-dominated crowd. And other “folksey” practices originated during this time, such as hand-holding or the congregation assuming the priestly orans posture (arms extended upwards, palms open and facing outward).

Sadly (and mysteriously), these decades also saw some 95% of known cases of priest child abuse. Nobody is really sure why. We’ve heard a lot about these cases because they have finally come to light, but the majority of these crimes occurred during this time, and largely ceased without being widely discovered. Nobody is really sure why the began in such a widespread manner, and ceased without being “shut down.”

This was also an age of extreme liturgical abuse by priests. They would allow (or encourage) practices that were absolutely forbidden (such as allowing laypeople to preach Sunday homilies). I’ve read accounts of a “clown Mass” (the priest and servers in clown costumes) and a “gun Mass” (a rifle was placed in a stand on the altar as an anti-war protest, and remained there throughout the Mass). Some priests encouraged the congregation to pray along with him during parts of the consecration that are reserved to the priest alone (I personally saw this done in multiple parishes). And a hundred other absurd accounts. There are still vestiges of this. My brother (Fr. Eric Filmer) sometimes serves at other Parishes, and the sacristan or somebody will try to tell him “how we do Mass here,” and which prayers have been reworded (usually to make them gender-neutral or incisive). And he always answers, “that might be how y’all say Mass, but this is how Father Eric says Mass,” and he taps the Missal.

And there was (and still is) a definite reduction in teaching and emphasis on the Communion of Saints, and the Blessed Mother in particular. I cannot recall the last time I have heard a homily that mentioned this. I rarely see people praying the Rosary before Mass - once a common practice. All forms of private devotion have been de-emphasized. Except the Divine Mercy. Which is, of course, not related to the Communion of Saints.
 
You might want to specifically ask for (name removed by moderator)ut from British Catholics.

I grew up in the 1960s and 1970s in California. I had relatives in other parts of the United States and based on what they would tell my parents things differed greatly from one part of the country to another. I would guess that the British Catholic experiences had some similarity to those of the United States but probably had considerable differences too.
 
Look here more than half-way down there is a heading called something like Michael Davies Talks. The first one is called Catechetical Revolution. This discusses a lot of the difficulties involved in catechesis in the British Isles at that time. All the catechists went to one bad place for training.

Some of the other talks here may also help you get ideas also. This is a page of MP3 talks. The Archives page leads to back issuess of their newsletter, bit i am not sire that goes back far enough.

Overall, I think if you just consider what was happening ij the US at the time and add in Twiggy, you’ll have it down 😉
 
Thanks, everyone who’s answered so far!

I agree that British Catholics’ (name removed by moderator)ut would be the most helpful, but I’ll take information from anyone; I’ll just make sure that it applies to England before I include it.
 
I offer four things from the 1960’2 and 1970’s:
  1. Pope Paul VI promulgated the revised rite of Mass with his Apostolic Constitution
    Missale Romanum (Roman Missal) in 1969.
Some highlights:

The rites of the Ordinary of the Mass (in Latin, Ordo Missae) - that is, the largely unvarying part of the liturgy - were “simplified, due care being taken to preserve their substance.” “Elements that, with the passage of time, came to be duplicated or were added with but little advantage” were eliminated, especially in the rites for the presentation of the bread and wine, the breaking of the bread, and communion.

“Other elements that have suffered injury through accidents of history” were restored “to the tradition of the Fathers,” for example, the homily and the general intercessions or prayer of the faithful.

The proportion of the Bible read at Mass was greatly increased. Prior to the reforms of Pius XII, 1% of the Old Testament and 16.5% of the New Testament had been read at Mass. Since 1970, Sundays and weekdays (leaving aside major feasts) have been 13.5% of the Old Testament and 71.5% of the New Testament. This was made possible through an increase in the number of readings at Mass and the introduction of a three-year cycle of readings on Sundays and a two-year cycle on weekdays.

The Roman Missal noted that the revision considerably modified other sections of the Missal, such as the Proper of Seasons, the Proper of Saints, the Common of Saints, the Ritual Masses and the Votive Masses, adding that “[the] number [of the prayers] has been increased, so that the new forms might better correspond to new needs, and the text of older prayers has been restored on the basis of the ancient sources”. This served the United States particularly well because at Trent there were no “American born” saints, but by the 1960’s, there were and they can be found on our calendar. I believe there are 15 now.
  1. In the 60’s and 70’s the church universal started working on two huge things 1) a new Catechism (the baltimore catechism was local, not universal) which came out in 1992 and 2) an update of the code of canon law which came out in 1983.
  2. Also, countries/provinces/areas began to institute “councils of bishops” (the USCCB for example was established in 1966 after many variations going back to 1917). They are Episcopal Conferences, Conference of Bishops, or National Conference of Bishops. Certain tasks and authority are delegated to Episcopal conferences, particularly with regard to setting the liturgical norms for the Mass. Episcopal conferences are delegated by the authority by the Holy See, and decisions of an Episcopal conference are subject to ratification from the Holy See.
  1. Re-institution of the Catechumenate, or RCIA in 1972.
 
You may find a book called A Bitter Trial helpful. It’s a collection of letters written by the celebrated English author Evelyn Waugh, concerning the changes in Catholicism he experienced in the last decade of his life (d. 1966).

The highlights of changes (most of which are discussed in the book) are:

-a new missal that was partly in English with revised rubrics was adopted in Nov. 1964

-another more radically changed missal was adopted between Nov. 1969 and into 1970 (the modern one most Roman Catholics know today)

-around 1972, Pope Paul VI granted what has become known as the “Agatha Christie Indult” allowing the 1964 Mass to be said in a few places for Catholics who had trouble adjusting to the 1969 missal (note: the “Latin Mass” or 1962 missal was still banned).
 
How does that reference answer the question?

Peace,
Ed
Because the OP asked for things going on around the 60’s and 70’s and Vatican II would be one of those major events occurring around that time.
 
This was a time of great tumult in the Church. Vatican-2 ran from 1962-1965, and was badly misunderstood due to a lot of misinformation (some of it deliberate). Catholics were told (and believed) that it was now OK to use birth control, that premarital sex was not such a big deal, drugs were fine as long as we didn’t do anything harmful to others, and lots of other bunk. In many instances, this misinformation was deliberate, to try to compel the Church to accept these ideas because they were so widely believed, and opposing them would be considered unpopular (which is exactly how that went down, but the Church would never allow Her doctrine to be dictated by lies told to the Faithful).

There were lots of actual changes, many of which were unpopular. Mass in the vernacular is the biggest. New architechural giudelines caused many Parishes to be gutted of many beautiful statues, paintings, windows, etc, and artistically magnificent churches were transformed overnight to resemble sparse protestant worship halls. Altar rails were removed, and people began to receive Communion while standing. The “final Gospel” was removed from the end of the Mass (the first few verses of the Gospel of John).

This era saw the establishment of a charismatic movement within Catholicism - the first (and only) time a movement of protestant origin was accepted by large numbers of the Faithful. The modern “folk Mass” came out of this hippie-dominated crowd. And other “folksey” practices originated during this time, such as hand-holding or the congregation assuming the priestly orans posture (arms extended upwards, palms open and facing outward).

Sadly (and mysteriously), these decades also saw some 95% of known cases of priest child abuse. Nobody is really sure why. We’ve heard a lot about these cases because they have finally come to light, but the majority of these crimes occurred during this time, and largely ceased without being widely discovered. Nobody is really sure why the began in such a widespread manner, and ceased without being “shut down.”

This was also an age of extreme liturgical abuse by priests. They would allow (or encourage) practices that were absolutely forbidden (such as allowing laypeople to preach Sunday homilies). I’ve read accounts of a “clown Mass” (the priest and servers in clown costumes) and a “gun Mass” (a rifle was placed in a stand on the altar as an anti-war protest, and remained there throughout the Mass). Some priests encouraged the congregation to pray along with him during parts of the consecration that are reserved to the priest alone (I personally saw this done in multiple parishes). And a hundred other absurd accounts. There are still vestiges of this. My brother (Fr. Eric Filmer) sometimes serves at other Parishes, and the sacristan or somebody will try to tell him “how we do Mass here,” and which prayers have been reworded (usually to make them gender-neutral or incisive). And he always answers, “that might be how y’all say Mass, but this is how Father Eric says Mass,” and he taps the Missal.

And there was (and still is) a definite reduction in teaching and emphasis on the Communion of Saints, and the Blessed Mother in particular. I cannot recall the last time I have heard a homily that mentioned this. I rarely see people praying the Rosary before Mass - once a common practice. All forms of private devotion have been de-emphasized. Except the Divine Mercy. Which is, of course, not related to the Communion of Saints.
I was there before and after Vatican II. There was no major changes that disrupted my desire to worship God. Vatican II did not even suggest any of the outward changes that occurred. We went to Mass to worship God. Not until the early 1970s, did the dissidents inside and outside the Church begin to spread lies and encourage the Catholic in the pew to think about what he had been taught differently. These dissidents are dying out now.

There were still people, including my mother, praying the rosary, Eucharistic Adoration, Stations of the Cross and other things that did not change. But a group of someones started a carefully planned, organized attack against the Church. Pope John Paul II began to turn things around, Pope Benedict even more, and Pope Francis is, by all accounts, rerooting the Church.

It was not until the late 1960s that Hippies, Anarchists and lunatics caused confusion among Catholics, followed by the pornographers and rabble-rousers in the early 1970s. Until 1973 or so, we were pretty much the Church we were, but the voices of what was to be called “the culture of death” worked toward that end. Abortion legalized for no good reason in 1973, homosexuality removed as a disorder from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychiatric Association due to outside pressure from gay radicals, the increasing use of illegal drugs and the opening of porn bookstores, strip clubs and topless bars, at great cost, everywhere. There was only one goal: scatter and confuse the flock. Tell young people that mom, dad, priests, nuns didn’t matter anymore. They would be FREE! But free of what? God. Free to do what? Sin. It was “legal” now, right?

Now, right now. People are realizing they were slaves. That being a dope-smoking, womanizing, porn addicted, nobody can tell me what to do radical has not brought them freedom but varying degrees of misery. And some are coming back. The “experiment” was a complete failure. Families ruined. Lives aborted.

Peace,
Ed
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top