G
gilliam
Guest
[Ramesh Ponnuru]
Republican congressmen Jim Sensenbrenner, Henry Hyde, and Pete King have sent an open letter to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. An excerpt:
Since the House bill’s passage, many have misconstrued the House’s good-faith effort to bring human traffickers to justice as a way to criminalize humanitarian assistance efforts. The House bill does no such thing, nor did it intend to.
We can assure you, just as under current law, religious organizations would not have to “card” people at soup kitchens and homeless shelters under the House bill’s anti-smuggling provisions. Prosecutors would no sooner prosecute good Samaritans for “assisting” illegal immigrants to remain in the U.S. under the House bill than they would prosecute such persons for “encouraging” illegal immigrants to remain in the U.S. under current law, which has existed for nearly 20 years.
Nonetheless, we stand willing to work with you and other persons of good will to ensure humanitarian assistance efforts are not mistakenly ensnared in this moral effort to end suffering at the hands of human traffickers. We remain optimistic this goal can be achieved.
Lastly, we know many of you are concerned about the House bill’s provision making illegal presence a felony. We share that concern. As you should know, during the House debate, Chairman Sensenbrenner offered an amendment to reduce the bill’s penalty for illegal presence from a felony to a misdemeanor. Unfortunately, this amendment was unsuccessful, primarily because all but eight of our Democratic colleagues decided to play political games by voting to make all illegal immigrants felons. A felony penalty is neither appropriate nor workable. We remain committed to reducing this penalty and working with you to this end.
Posted at 01:45 PM
Republican congressmen Jim Sensenbrenner, Henry Hyde, and Pete King have sent an open letter to the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. An excerpt:
Since the House bill’s passage, many have misconstrued the House’s good-faith effort to bring human traffickers to justice as a way to criminalize humanitarian assistance efforts. The House bill does no such thing, nor did it intend to.
We can assure you, just as under current law, religious organizations would not have to “card” people at soup kitchens and homeless shelters under the House bill’s anti-smuggling provisions. Prosecutors would no sooner prosecute good Samaritans for “assisting” illegal immigrants to remain in the U.S. under the House bill than they would prosecute such persons for “encouraging” illegal immigrants to remain in the U.S. under current law, which has existed for nearly 20 years.
Nonetheless, we stand willing to work with you and other persons of good will to ensure humanitarian assistance efforts are not mistakenly ensnared in this moral effort to end suffering at the hands of human traffickers. We remain optimistic this goal can be achieved.
Lastly, we know many of you are concerned about the House bill’s provision making illegal presence a felony. We share that concern. As you should know, during the House debate, Chairman Sensenbrenner offered an amendment to reduce the bill’s penalty for illegal presence from a felony to a misdemeanor. Unfortunately, this amendment was unsuccessful, primarily because all but eight of our Democratic colleagues decided to play political games by voting to make all illegal immigrants felons. A felony penalty is neither appropriate nor workable. We remain committed to reducing this penalty and working with you to this end.
Posted at 01:45 PM
You think the Democrats were genuinely voting for presence to be a felony? I didn’t think Democrats supported that.
I wish they were the ones who were in charge. 