W
Winters
Guest
My Czech family accuses Catholics of murdering Jan Huss. Is this true?
Winters
Winters
It is the nature of the medieval psyche, not Catholicism per se that led to his execution. The medieval man regarded heresy as crimes worse than theft or homicide since it involves the soul, which the medieval mind valued more, in addition to the fact that heresy is often accompanied by acts of rebellion and violence, which indeed was the case with Huss’ followers, called Hussites. Thus, even Protestants themselves, who regarded Huss as a forerunner, persecuted those whom they called heretics.Jan Huss was turned over to and executed by secular authorities, as heresy in those days was a civil, criminal offense due to the social disruption that it caused.
Jan Huss preached the heresies of Wyclif, and the Wycliff bible is so full of errors, not even Protestants would accept it.
Jan Huss had a trial, unlike the 150,000 “witches” who were burned at the stake by reformist fanatics.
Yes, Jan Hus was murdered by Catholics!Murder applies to an unlawful and malicious or premeditated killing.
Blah, blah, blah. So what? That’s not what’s being disucssed or disputed here. The poster asked about a specific historical incident, and in no way implies that this somehow undermines the claims of the Catholic Church.Catholics murdered proto-protestants and protestants, protestansts murdered catholics, protestants murdered other protestants. There is a lot of blame and share of guilt to go around. Christ is perfect Christians are not.
Get your facts right. Protestants were certainly not responsible for the deaths of 150,000 witches. The best modern estimates are that, from 1400 to 1800, some 30,000 to 50,000 “witches” were executed, by both Catholics and Protestants; and far more by the Catholics (though, in the vast majority of cases, by secular courts, and without Church approval).Jan Huss had a trial, unlike the 150,000 “witches” who were burned at the stake by reformist fanatics.
That having been said, I would argue that, under certain conditions, the Catholic State does have a right to persecute, even execute, heretics who choose to publicly profess their belief, and so undermine and destroy the true religion. (Though this should be a last resort, and resorted to only when other punishments [like imprisonment, fines, exiles] would not serve the needs of a society.)
- If a legal abortion is murder, then so was the legal killing of Jan Hus.
I could not argue that any state has the right to execute it’s citizens: Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox or atheist.That having been said, I would argue that, under certain conditions, the Catholic State does have a right to persecute, even execute, heretics who choose to publicly profess their belief, and so undermine and destroy the true religion. (Though this should be a last resort, and resorted to only when other punishments [like imprisonment, fines, exiles] would not serve the needs of a society.)
I’ve read somewhere he was indeed promised safe conduct to the Council and present his views there, yet he was seized and executed after a “trial”. If this were indeed a travesty of a trial, then it can be termed murder, rather than a mere execution, and in this case it is indeed right that the Pope himself apologize for this sad incident.Hus was not given a lawful trial, and executed duely. Rather, he was promised, by the Church, safe passage to the Ecuemnical Council of Constance to present (and even make a defense of) his heretical teachings, and once he got there the promise was broken and he was burnt for heresy.
I think it is about time for everyone to leave this sad incident behind and get on with our lives, and learn from it in the process. This in no way diminishes or falsifies the claims, or the truth of the Catholic faith, but of course, we do wish things then could have been done differently.Thank you all for your responses. Perhaps the most profound was,
If only we could undo the damage that mistake caused!
Some 500 years later Czechs still moan about it and mostly ignore Catholicism citing this as a reason. I suppose it’s largely a problem of their failure to get over their many “victimhoods”.
But on the other hand, thank God the pope finally apologized. This could have been done 100 years ago or even 50 years ago. Why did it take so long for men (ie popes) in such a holy position in God’s church to initiate the healing process?
Winters
Not that it takes away responsibility, or makes this situtuation the least bit onerous, but, did the “Church” actually kill him?Get your facts right.
I agree, sort of.I think it is about time for everyone to leave this sad incident behind and get on with our lives, and learn from it in the process. This in no way diminishes or falsifies the claims, or the truth of the Catholic faith, but of course, we do wish things then could have been done differently.
Gerry![]()
It seems other posters also think it’s time to move on. Perhaps it makes us uncomfortable just like the dozens of popes before JPII (of course they weren’t from a neighboring, slavic country).I think it is about time for everyone to leave this sad incident behind and get on with our lives, and learn from it in the process.
This is heresy; completely contrary to the Church’s Scripture and Tradition, as authentically interpreted by her Magisterium.I could not argue that any state has the right to execute it’s citizens: Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox or atheist.
I never said that you personally were a heretic; merely that the teaching you presented was heretical.Are you calling me a heretic? On what grounds?