F
flick427
Guest
So here is the deal, I am watching this video on evolution vs. creationisim with my friend. The person giving the talk is a fundamentalist baptist of some sort that was also a scientist (hence the video). Of course, he couldn’t just talk about science and creation…NO, that would be too easy, he just had to point the finger at Mormans and Catholics :banghead: (grouping them together oddly enough) when talking about the purpose of life etc.
He pointed out how the Mormans supposedly believe they will become gods when they die, I don’t have his reference for that, then he said “and then the Catholic teaching is this”…and quoted the below segment from the Catechism of the Catholic Church. He now concluded that we believe that we became or “are” God or “a god” or whatever…so, I went home and read it to see if he was taking it out of context, and he was for the most part, but I personally would have no idea how to defend this one if it came up in conversation…any suggestions??? (the part he quoted is in bold red)…needless to say, he had some good points about science and creation, but I had a hard time believing him after his bias was suddenly thrown into the whole thing…man, what a buzz kill !..better go pray for the fundamentalist now …
460 The Word became flesh to make us “partakers of the divine nature”:78 "For this is why the Word became man, and the Son of God became the Son of man: so that man, by entering into communion with the Word and thus receiving divine sonship, might become a son of God."79 "For the Son of God became man so that we might become God."80 "The only-begotten Son of God, wanting to make us sharers in his divinity, assumed our nature, so that he, made man, might make men gods."81
78 2 Pt 1:4.
79 St. Irenaeus, Adv. haeres. 3, 19, 1: PG 7/1, 939.
80 St. Athanasius, De inc. 54, 3: PG 25, 192B.
81 St. Thomas Aquinas, Opusc. 57, 1-4.
He pointed out how the Mormans supposedly believe they will become gods when they die, I don’t have his reference for that, then he said “and then the Catholic teaching is this”…and quoted the below segment from the Catechism of the Catholic Church. He now concluded that we believe that we became or “are” God or “a god” or whatever…so, I went home and read it to see if he was taking it out of context, and he was for the most part, but I personally would have no idea how to defend this one if it came up in conversation…any suggestions??? (the part he quoted is in bold red)…needless to say, he had some good points about science and creation, but I had a hard time believing him after his bias was suddenly thrown into the whole thing…man, what a buzz kill !..better go pray for the fundamentalist now …
460 The Word became flesh to make us “partakers of the divine nature”:78 "For this is why the Word became man, and the Son of God became the Son of man: so that man, by entering into communion with the Word and thus receiving divine sonship, might become a son of God."79 "For the Son of God became man so that we might become God."80 "The only-begotten Son of God, wanting to make us sharers in his divinity, assumed our nature, so that he, made man, might make men gods."81
78 2 Pt 1:4.
79 St. Irenaeus, Adv. haeres. 3, 19, 1: PG 7/1, 939.
80 St. Athanasius, De inc. 54, 3: PG 25, 192B.
81 St. Thomas Aquinas, Opusc. 57, 1-4.