I was talking to my girlfriend the other day, and she mentioned that her dad did not believe God was an intellect. While I was reviewing the summa on God’s cognition, my brain started to whirl. I was trying to understand all Aquinas’ points up until cognition in my mind and was having a terribly hard time doing it. After all, we have discursive minds and I was attempting to skip knowing things habitually. I made a flow chart on how Aquinas’ proofs depend on previous ones so previously proven points can be taken for granted and known habitually. That way, I could understand the latter points of his argumentation. I figured this was the best place to put the chart up for scrutiny and make sure I didn’t skip any of his essential argumentation for any particular subject. Criticism welcome!
DISCLAIMER: Catholic Answers has turned over the archive to Catholic-Questions.org and no longer owns, manages, or moderates the forums. For additional apologetics resources please visit www.catholic.com.