W
WanderAimlessly
Guest
They should also lose all Federal funds.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Christian Student Sues Missouri State U After Punished for Opposing Homosexual Adopti
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
C
Crow
Guest
Isn’t nice how everyone is tolerant of anything and everything except the truth?
F
Fitz
Guest
I am glad this student is willing to come forward. The more this happens, the more the professors will think twice before forcing their views and actions on the students.
M
MichaelTDoyle
Guest
It’s interesting how the linked article is worded. I wonder if the lawyers are wording it the same way. Why does one have to oppose homosexual behaviour based on “religous beliefs”?
I didn’t see in the article her saying her opposition was religously based. There are plenty of strong arguments for opposing homosexual activities and legalization of homosexual adoption on philosophical and cultural grounds.
Secondly, why is homosexuality a diversity issue? Homosexual activism is a political stance. One may (or may not) be born with such an orientation, but acting on it is a political and social stance, which Americans should be free to vociferously oppose.
It says something about the power of the media that this argument is framed in terms of homosexuals adopting babies versus Christians.
This can be fought entirely on secular grounds and must be since no homosexual can with honesty be actively professing the lifestyle and Christian which explicitly calls for chastity outside of man/woman marriage at the same time.
I didn’t see in the article her saying her opposition was religously based. There are plenty of strong arguments for opposing homosexual activities and legalization of homosexual adoption on philosophical and cultural grounds.
Secondly, why is homosexuality a diversity issue? Homosexual activism is a political stance. One may (or may not) be born with such an orientation, but acting on it is a political and social stance, which Americans should be free to vociferously oppose.
It says something about the power of the media that this argument is framed in terms of homosexuals adopting babies versus Christians.
This can be fought entirely on secular grounds and must be since no homosexual can with honesty be actively professing the lifestyle and Christian which explicitly calls for chastity outside of man/woman marriage at the same time.
C
Chickamauga
Guest
Read the legal complaint which was linked at the bottom of the article. The complaint reads in part:I didn’t see in the article her saying her opposition was religously based.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
A. Discrimination against Brooker’s religious beliefs
Note paragraph 40: "Ms. Brooker stated her disagreement with the topic because it conflicted with her sincerely held religous beliefs."
B
bones_IV
Guest
Scary to think what the next generation will do if they’re in power.Isn’t nice how everyone is tolerant of anything and everything except the truth?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.