Christianity Simplified – For Everyone

  • Thread starter Thread starter JRKH
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

JRKH

Guest
Recently we enjoyed a thread here called “What Sola did Jesus Teach”. It turned into such a pleasant, and spiritually re-enforcing experience that I decided to expand upon it a little. Therefore I invite every Christian in every faith walk to consider this:

A Christian, by definition holds to a set of beliefs based upon the life, death and resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth as recorded in the 4 Gospels contained in the Christian Bible. A Christian must first of all believe in and accept Christ’s passion death and resurrection as this is regarded as the perfect sacrifice for the forgiveness of sins.

Secondly, but equal in importance is to recognize and accept the teachings of Christ during His ministry. These teachings are evident in both words and deeds. These teachings, the Christian must put into practice, to the best of his/her ability, in order to truly claim the name “Christian”, that is, a follower of Christ. Therefore any faith construct must take as it’s core the teachings of Christ.

When studying or developing an understanding of Christian teaching it is necessary to understand the construction of Sacred Scripture. Without this it is easy to fall into confusion. I am not talking about a deep difficult understanding of language, sentence construction, translation variances or other scholarly devices, but rather an understanding of the relative importance of the various books in the Bible.

Some will say that all of the Books of the bible are equally important since we accept them all as being divinely inspired. In one sense this is true. It is important that we have all of the Books, but it does not mean that they all carry the same weight in our personal understanding and application to our lives and salvation journey. For instance we read many laws and ordinances in the OT that we are told later that we don’t have to follow as Christians. Thus we know that the OT Laws are not as important as the NT commands.

If one is to declare ones self, Christian, it is a natural conclusion that the 4 Gospels, which contain Jesus actual teachings, would be the most important books in the Bible. Any Truly Christian Belief system must, then build upon the lessons learned at the master’s feet. Our walk with Jesus must begin with His teachings and only then can other teachings/interpretations be introduced to support/define these teachings.

Around the Gospels are built the supporting documents for Christ’s teachings. These are, first the Epistles, which contain various interpretations and explanations on the teachings of Jesus, Then Acts with it’s descriptions of the Early Church, Followed by the OT which contains references which Jesus uses, and finally (in my personal view) Revelation, which contains little of significant use in our day to day walk with Christ.

Jesus spent three years teaching His disciples how to live in, promote and spread the Good News of the Kingdom of God. All of these lessons are contained in the Gospels. Therefore in following Christ it is necessary to read and understand the lessons of the Gospels in their entirely, as a whole, and not as a series of separate chapters and verses to be defined or dissected. This is the first lesson for the True Christian, to read the Gospels as a whole and let their lessons flow over and around you.

Jesus is teaching a “Total” message; a way of life, a call to holiness. He extols us to move beyond ourselves, and beyond mindless obedience to the letter of some “Law”. Regardless of what those around Him were doing, or what they asked about salvation, He always asked for a bit more. He asked this, not as a condemnation, but as a revelation. He did not tell us this as “God”, but as a fellow man. Jesus, we are taught, is fully human as well as fully God. Therefore does it make sense that Jesus would ask more of His fellow man than what He knew we were capable of? In this Jesus places a challenge before us. That Challenge is to live as He lived and to love as he loves, even unto death. True Christianity demands no less. He demonstrated this in the most profound way by His acceptance of the Cross-, His loving forgiveness of His Tormentors and the ultimate Triumph in His Resurrection.

By His teaching, Jesus gave us no “Sola”, beyond that of Love in action. Yes we must believe; yes we must have faith; yes we must trust in Him, but just as importantly we must DO; we must Love; we must heal; we must persevere; we must sin no more; we must be humble; we must be honest and trustworthy etc. and then, in his loving goodness he told us that, if we failed, he would forgive us if we turn back to Him. From the Sermon on the Mount, to His command to make disciples of all nations, Jesus taught a fellowship of Love and Love in action; a call to Holiness and forgiveness.

Those who base their theology primarily on quotes from those who followed Jesus make a grave error for to do so subverts the lessons of Jesus. When one declares for instance a doctrine of Faith Alone and uses primarily quotations from Paul to support it, that person becomes then a disciple of Paul and not a disciple of Jesus. They become a Paulian instead of a Christian for they put greater stock in the preaching of a disciple of Christ than they do in Christ Himself.

Equally as dangerous is pulling verses from this or that place in the Bible and stringing them together to form some kind of whole. This method can, and has been, used to support the most outlandish ideas that fly in the face of Christ’s message of Love for us.

I ask all of us here to examine our beliefs in this light. Does our belief system jive with the totality of Christ’s message, or do we rely too much on other influences, or just on certain portions of the Total message. I pray that we do this that we may draw closer to our Lord and to each other in Truly Christian Love and Fellowship. That we may show everyone we come in contact with that calm, serene, confidence of the true Child of God and Brother of Christ.

Peace
James
 
I do not think your view that certain books of the New Testament are more important than others is scriptural. I also do not think it is Catholic teaching either. On the other hand, your post was well-written and I can tell you gave it a lot of thought. That is all I can really add.
 
I do not think your view that certain books of the New Testament are more important than others is scriptural. I also do not think it is Catholic teaching either. On the other hand, your post was well-written and I can tell you gave it a lot of thought. That is all I can really add.
Thank you for your kind post.
I fully expect that there will be some concern about how I listed the relative importance of the books in the Bible, but I do stick by this regardless. It is, of course, my own expression and I do not claim to speak for the Church. The Church’s teachings are ably laid out in many places and I certainly do not need to re-iterate them.

I do not mean to belittle any of the books in the Bible and the “rankings” I give them really are intended only as a guide to proper understanding of Christ’s message and mission. If I may be allowed a very poor analogy, ranking the Books of the Bible sort of like judging a beauty contest. Once your each a certain level of beauty, talent, intelligence etc. what is the point of trying to pick one from the many. Yet in this case, it is necessary to determine the core documents and teachings in order to understand the whole. Without this understanding, there is much in the Bible which is confusing and contradictory.

So long as teaching and interpretion was the pervue of the trained and learned men of the Church, this was less of a problem. However today, with the supposed right of individual interpretation firmly in place, we need something more than just holding up the Bible and saying, “follow this for this is the Word of God”. Yet this is what happens to far too many people. The only way out of this for a true Christian, in my view, is to stick firmly to Christ’s own words. Then one can build upon these by using the other Books and sources.

It seems so often that we get into discussions of whis or that theology and wind up quoting from all over the Bible instead of zeroing in on what Christ tells us. The reason I mentioned the thread “What Sola Did Jesus Teach” was to show how, once we had limited teh discussion to precisely what Jesus taught, much of the contention just fell away. Granted some other quotes were brought in later in the thread, but we were able to discuss the core message and mission of Christianity in greater clarity and Charity when we concentrated on Jesus instead of Paul or some other disciple.

This is what I am trying to get others to look at.

May God Guide us All

Peace
James
 
Great post. I would say two little things.

First, perhaps instead of more important, something along the lines of more central? The Gospels alone teach us the basics, while the other Books expound and explain.

Second, Revelation does give us a message of hope in dark times. Jesus will return!!
 
From the Catechism of the Catholic Church:
134 All Sacred Scripture is but one book, and this one book is Christ, “because all divine Scripture speaks of Christ, and all divine Scripture is fulfilled in Christ” (Hugh of St. Victor, De arca Noe 2, 8: PL 176, 642: cf. ibid. 2, 9: PL 176, 642-643).
135 “The Sacred Scriptures contain the Word of God and, because they are inspired, they are truly the Word of God” (DV 24).
136 God is the author of Sacred Scripture because he inspired its human authors; he acts in them and by means of them. He thus gives assurance that their writings teach without error his saving truth (cf. DV 11).
137 Interpretation of the inspired Scripture must be attentive above all to what God wants to reveal through the sacred authors for our salvation. What comes from the Spirit is not fully “understood except by the Spirit’s Action” (cf. Origen, Hom. in Ex. 4, 5: PG 12, 320).
138 The Church accepts and venerates as inspired the 46 books of the Old Testament and the 27 books of the New.
139 The four Gospels occupy a central place because Christ Jesus is their centre.
140 The unity of the two Testaments proceeds from the unity of God’s plan and his Revelation. The Old Testament prepares for the New and the New Testament fulfils the Old; the two shed light on each other; both are true Word of God.
141 “The Church has always venerated the divine Scriptures as she venerated the Body of the Lord” (DV 21): both nourish and govern the whole Christian life. “Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light to my path” (Ps 119:105; cf. Isa 50:4).
Hope this helps,
Paul
 
Great post. I would say two little things.

First, perhaps instead of more important, something along the lines of more central? The Gospels alone teach us the basics, while the other Books expound and explain.

Second, Revelation does give us a message of hope in dark times. Jesus will return!!
Thanks to both ralphinal and PaulDupre for your posts. The reference to the Catechism is appreciated.

ralph,
I hear what your saying about the term “central”. I think I would not say “More Central” though. To the Christian, the Gospels ARE Central, or should be. If anyone claiming the Title Christian tries to build doctrine or understanding from any other source, even other books in the Bible, they are already starting from a eccentric position.
Hey maybe that’s why trying to discuss some of these things makes me dizzy:hypno:

Peace
James
 
I believe the problem lies in the fact that some people put a false dichotomy between the writings of St. Paul and the Gospels. I am currently reading: St. Paul’s Gospel by Ronald Knox in which Knox explains quite beautifully Paul’s teachings about Christ and why he never wrote a Gospel of his own. I highly recommend it to everyone, Catholic and non-Catholic alike.
 
You know, more central is kinda funny sounding. Just central would have been better.

I get so frustraited when talking to Protestants who only quote Paul. I mean there are other books in the Bible. Paul said this and Paul said that. No wonder Muslims think he invented the Church.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top