Church and state

  • Thread starter Thread starter jp54321
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
J

jp54321

Guest
I’ve watched Russia in the news and I’ve seen that they put a law banning homosexual propoganda to minors, banned Russian children from being adopted in countries where gay marriage is legal, banned gay pride parades, strong federal support to the Church. I know that in Russia they are separated from the Catholic Church but if they were Catholic, are these laws consistent with Catholic teachings on church and state?
 
I’ve watched Russia in the news and I’ve seen that they put a law banning homosexual propoganda to minors, banned Russian children from being adopted in countries where gay marriage is legal, banned gay pride parades, strong federal support to the Church. I know that in Russia they are separated from the Catholic Church but if they were Catholic, are these laws consistent with Catholic teachings on church and state?
These laws are consistent with Nazi Germany, 1936.
 
If it is flat-out discrimination, then I would think not. If it is not, and it is truly protecting children and morality, then it may certainly be (but most Catholics these days might use the “discrimination” card for that question).
 
As far as I know the Vatican hasn’t been critical of those laws, but perhaps someone else knows more. When he was Cardinal Bergoglio, Pope Francis compared the adoption of children by same sex couples, to child abuse.
 
The laws are consistent with a Catholic government. Russia is practically an Orthodox nation. The Orthodox are our brothers.
 
Those laws are completely consistent with Church teachings. If only more countries had laws like that.
 
These laws are consistent with Nazi Germany, 1936.
That skates very close to insulting those who were victims of Nazism, IMNAAHO.

Not only is no-one being killed in Russia, but disapproval of alternative forms of sexuality is not even comparable to persecuting citizens based on their genetic origins.

In any case, “separation of church and state” is a very Western idea.

ICXC NIKA
 
That skates very close to insulting those who were victims of Nazism, IMNAAHO.

Not only is no-one being killed in Russia, but disapproval of alternative forms of sexuality is not even comparable to persecuting citizens based on their genetic origins.

In any case, “separation of church and state” is a very Western idea.

ICXC NIKA
One that also doesn’t exist in the US constitution (read the first amendment) I might add. Does Russia have an official religion, out of curiosity? I don’t think it does; but would anyone really object to a country that is say, officially Catholic doing the same thing? I mean, it’s THEIR country.
 
Strip clubs and pornography were also illegal most places in the US, and I don’t think many people compared us with Nazi Germany because of it.
 
Strip clubs and pornography were also illegal most places in the US, and I don’t think many people compared us with Nazi Germany because of it.
Exactly. The legalization of immoral behavior is a relatively recent issue in the US. The indoctrination occurring in the media and in public schools are important issues.

I am not interested in a State religion, but I am concerned by a State that uses the force of law as far as who gets to use which bathroom.

Ed
 
Wow, pipe Francis calls for an apology to gays for them being marginalized, and there seems to be a huge increase in these kind of threads (punishment for sodomy/homosexual acts illegal) and now church and state. There is no way the Vatican would endorse this kind of discriminatory law. In Russia under this law I could go to jail or worse for holding my *husband’s hand in front of our own children. * that in itself is all one needs to know.
 
Wow, pipe Francis calls for an apology to gays for them being marginalized, and there seems to be a huge increase in these kind of threads (punishment for sodomy/homosexual acts illegal) and now church and state. There is no way the Vatican would endorse this kind of discriminatory law. In Russia under this law I could go to jail or worse for holding my *husband’s hand in front of our own children. * that in itself is all one needs to know.
Well, in the UAE’s Dubai Emirate (which is considered “moderate” under Sharia), and in much of the Sharia Islamic world, one can be deported and otherwise punished for heterosexual public affection anyhow. Holding hands, kissing, hugging…

As Christians, however, we should not be encouraging outright discrimination. Perhaps passive and neutral resistance in the secularization of the West. (Note: I would not consider it discrimination for a country to define marriage as between a man and a woman. DR Congo does that, and they haven’t been criticized by the liberals yet.)

Also, in Vatican City which is under papal sovereignty, homosexuality (though not homosexual marriage, obviously) is legal. There is even a Wikipedia page that I got that from titled “LGBT Rights in Vatican City.”
 
Exactly. The legalization of immoral behavior is a relatively recent issue in the US. The indoctrination occurring in the media and in public schools are important issues.

I am not interested in a State religion, but I am concerned by a State that uses the force of law as far as who gets to use which bathroom.
I think what they want it to be right now is like the Roman Empire after the Edict of Milan (AD 313) – all religions tolerated, homosexuality was still a practice, cults and religions could still set up their temples and houses of worship. Except “without the sexism,” I suppose.

Oh, but they won’t stop there. That’s their cover.
 
I’ve watched Russia in the news and I’ve seen that they put a law banning homosexual propoganda to minors, banned Russian children from being adopted in countries where gay marriage is legal, banned gay pride parades,** strong federal support to the Church.** I know that in Russia they are separated from the Catholic Church but if they were Catholic, are these laws consistent with Catholic teachings on church and state?
I don’t think Russia has strong federal support for the Church. It has come out that it’s illegal to evangelize outside the church buildings.

I think these laws are consistent with Catholic teachings on church and state.
 
I don’t think Russia has strong federal support for the Church. It has come out that it’s illegal to evangelize outside the church buildings.
.
Post Soviet Russia has very strong support for the Church - the Russian Orthodox Church. All others, for the most part, are not so welcome. They obviously have other branches of the Church in the country as guests, but as you said, they have made it criminal to evangelize/proselytize in public. That has put a damper on Evangelical and Mormon efforts especially. Oh, and Jews haven’t been welcome in a VERY long time. Pogroms are still a distant memory to many.
 
Post Soviet Russia has very strong support for the Church - the Russian Orthodox Church. All others, for the most part, are not so welcome. They obviously have other branches of the Church in the country as guests, but as you said, they have made it criminal to evangelize/proselytize in public. That has put a damper on Evangelical and Mormon efforts especially. Oh, and Jews haven’t been welcome in a VERY long time. Pogroms are still a distant memory to many.
There are quite a few countries which have laws against proselytizing, two are America’s close allies Saudi Arabia and Israel.
 
There are quite a few countries which have laws against proselytizing, two are America’s close allies Saudi Arabia and Israel.
Yes. Agreed. I don’t know Saudi Arabia but I do know Israel. They are quite fine with being multi-religious (it is the Holy Land, after all), allowing even Mormons to settle there, but there are strict rules about proselytizing. I can well understand why, given the history of forced conversions.
 
Yes. Agreed. I don’t know Saudi Arabia but I do know Israel. They are quite fine with being multi-religious (it is the Holy Land, after all), allowing even Mormons to settle there, but there are strict rules about proselytizing. I can well understand why, given the history of forced conversions.
I’d imagine the law is more pragmatic than that; the place is a religious tinderbox. The last thing they need is the faith bodies that share it accusing each other of poaching their adherents.

ICXC NIKA
 
Basically Church teaches state exists for the common good.

The church would obviously judge the common good by catholic morality.

As to the laws you cite in general and simplest terms YES they are moral.

However, in totality few things are ever 100% moral. You say something is “illegal” and then comes in what does that mean? What punishment level? What ins and outs?

Someone mentioned hand holding in their home getting them in jail. Meh… that starts to be not so moral.

But also is that really the “law” or how someone could make it sound?

If you hear about a translated law from nother nation, told by bias individuals in summary, then summarized by 5 laymen in a awesome verion of the telephone game… that gay hand holding law could have been a law about metal frays on handrails…
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top