Church Conspiracy Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter John89
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
thx… i heard the theory from someone and just wanted to ask about it, im not saying i believe it… ill check out the sites thx, god bless 🙂
I thought so. 👍

As they say on the street, “Don’t believe the hype”. If you need to you can PM me and I can probably show you where to find answers to all this craziness.
 
The claims are a “jumping to conclusions” sort of thing.

What happened was that the chimney over the Sistine Chapel began blowing what seemed to be White Smoke, and this “white” smoke went on for over 5 minutes. Vatican Radio took the cue and announced that a pope had been selected and summoned the people to St. Peter’s (this actually happened), and kept making the announcement for about 20 to 30 minutes. Thousands of people showed up. Some claimed to have seen conclavists at the windows waving to the people below. Then Vatican Radio abruptly announced that they had made a mistake, that a pope had not been selected after all. The crowds left.
It was at this time, the theory alleges, that Siri had been chosen and threatened if he did not renounce his acceptance of the papacy. There is no solid evidence at all for this part.
A couple of days later, Roncalli was presented to the people as
Pope John the 23rd.

There was supposedly a bishop somewhere, who had been at the conclave and saw or was told first-hand what had happened to Siri, and he would neither confirm nor deny the story.
I forget his name, I read an article about it before, but I don’t remember this Cardinal’s name. Anyway, the whole Siri Thesis, as it is sometimes called, is based on these scanty facts which cannot be proven.

Jaypeeto4
+JMJ+
Incidentally, the same issue with the smoke occurred after the Conclave that elected Pius XII. Was HE also a Masonic infiltrator??? :eek:
 
1ke,
a lot of people believe this theory, especially those
inclined to sedevacantism.

One reason those people believe it
is that Cardinal Siri himself was ASKED in an interview
if it was true that he had been elected pope in 1958 before
Roncalli (Pope John 23rd) was chosen, and Siri himself
would not deny the claim, saying “I am bound
by the Secret.”

I take that to mean that he was bound, as all conclavists are,
not to reveal ANYTHING that happens or does not happen, during
a conclave. The theory-followers take his refusal to explicitly deny it, as an explicit affirmation…

Jaypeeto4
+JMJ+
The only person not bound by the Seal of the Conclave is the Pope who is elected. Ergo, Siri could not be the Pope, which is why he couldn’t DENY the claim, since even that would break the seal.
 
In reply to the 1st post. I have heard many stupid claims in my life time, but this one takes the cake.
Deacon Ed B
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top