M
Major
Guest
I am not really sure to which category I should put this question.
Does anyone knows how one should approach Pensées by Blais Pascal?
On one hand the book is praised by some speakers, certainly not from “modern branch” (Peter Kreeft for example) on the other it was put on the Index during Jansenist controversy and stayed there until now. While not binding for us anymore “the Index maintained its moral force, in that it taught Christians to beware (…), of those writings that could endanger faith and morality” (as Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith stated).
I have strong feeling that nowadays just no-one cares to reevaluate books in the index as no-one pays any attention to it, but maybe there is some good reason for Pensées to be approached with caution.
Does anyone knows how one should approach Pensées by Blais Pascal?
On one hand the book is praised by some speakers, certainly not from “modern branch” (Peter Kreeft for example) on the other it was put on the Index during Jansenist controversy and stayed there until now. While not binding for us anymore “the Index maintained its moral force, in that it taught Christians to beware (…), of those writings that could endanger faith and morality” (as Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith stated).
I have strong feeling that nowadays just no-one cares to reevaluate books in the index as no-one pays any attention to it, but maybe there is some good reason for Pensées to be approached with caution.