M
researchnews.osu.edu/archive/cohabit.htmI wonder if the Bishops will tell us the origin of their claim that: “In addition, countless studies have shown that couples who live together before marriage have higher rates of divorce and a poorer quality of marital relationship than those who do not.”
Thanks for the link. Interesting. But not one of the Bishops’ claims is backed up by anything in the link.
What you say is not what the Bishops said. they talked about cohabitation not fornication. And you have said nothing about the ‘quality of marital life’ claim. Any of those hundreds of studies back up the Bishops? Maybe not?There are hundreds of studies on the internet that show that fornication before marriage leads to a high divorce rate after marriage.
Also the bible says
Galatians 5:19-21 “Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these, ADULTERY, FORNICATION, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkenness, revelings, and such like; of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, THAT THEY WHICH DO SUCH THINGS SHALL NOT INHERIT THE KINGDOM OF GOD.”
The definition of cohabit from Dictionary.comWhat you say is not what the Bishops said. they talked about cohabitation not fornication. And you have said nothing about the ‘quality of marital life’ claim. Any of those hundreds of studies back up the Bishops? Maybe not?
The National Marriage Project, formerly at Rutgers University and now at the University of Virginia has done very thorough research on marriage, divorce, and cohabitation and the social and economin impacts associated with them:I wonder if the Bishops will tell us the origin of their claim that: “In addition, countless studies have shown that couples who live together before marriage have higher rates of divorce and a poorer quality of marital relationship than those who do not.”
Seriously? That’s your objection? Are you honestly arguing that cohabitation doesn’t necessarily involve fornication? Get out much?What you say is not what the Bishops said. they talked about cohabitation not fornication. And you have said nothing about the ‘quality of marital life’ claim. Any of those hundreds of studies back up the Bishops? Maybe not?
I can see that from your point of view cohabitation is a subset of the category fornication, but I do not think you can reasonably say that the two words are the same, and that evidence of the result of the wider category (fornication) therefore applies to the more narrow (cohabitation)Cohabitation IS fornication. It is simply fornication in which the fornicating couples live together instead of living separately and meeting together somewhere to fornicate.
I can’t see anything in here that supports what the bishops say. Can you point me to the relevant bit?The National Marriage Project, formerly at Rutgers University and now at the University of Virginia has done very thorough research on marriage, divorce, and cohabitation and the social and economin impacts associated with them:
virginia.edu/marriageproject/
the Bishops statement (mentioned by the OP) purports to compare married ‘cohabiters’ with couples who did not live together before marriage. The USCCB document does not seem to me to justify the clear and intended implication of the Bishops’ statement, which is that living together, in itself, leads to poorer outcomes in marriage. I also noticed that there is no mention in the USCCB document of the populations studied. This is an off omission. It also does not support the Bishops’ claim of ‘countless’ studies. I would have thought this would need a comprehensive literature review to support it, even considering the hyperbole.Some research studies on the problems of cohabitation are cited in the following document from the Catholic Church in the U.S. (see PART ONE, section 5 in this document):
www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/marriage-and-family/marriage/marriage-preparation/cohabiting.cfm
the Bishops statement (mentioned by the OP) purports to compare married ‘cohabiters’ with couples who did not live together before marriage. The USCCB document does not seem to me to justify the clear and intended implication of the Bishops’ statement, which is that living together, in itself, leads to poorer outcomes in marriage. I also noticed that there is no mention in the USCCB document of the populations studied. This is an off omission. It also does not support the Bishops’ claim of ‘countless’ studies. I would have thought this would need a comprehensive literature review to support it, even considering the hyperbole.