College Cancels Pro-Life Speaker

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rosalinda
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

Rosalinda

Guest
Decision Opposed by Some Faculty and Students, by Jack Poirier, The Observer,Tuesday, March 25, 2003.

(In view of Judy Rebick speaking tonight at the University of Western Ontario (London, Canada) in support of Dr. Morgentaler/Doris Anderson’s selection for honorary doctor of laws degree I think this article in my file shows a flagrant double standard in operation at our institutes of “higher learning.” All three of these Canadian personalities are known for their work promoting a woman’s right to choose death. The college in question is located about 60 miles outside of London.)

"A decision by Lambton College officials to cancel a pro-life seminar is being criticized by some college faculty and students.

In addition to speaking with area high schools, Michigan lawyer Rebecca Kiessling, a leading authority on abortion laws and the pro-life movement, was scheduled to speak to a small group of students at Lambton College today.

However, college administration nixed the scheduled presentation late Friday.(Note this was one business day before her appearance and after a publicity campaign including an extensive article about her in the Observer the week prior)

Kiessling calls the decision ludicrous. “What’s so ridiculous is these liberal institutions pride themselves as safe havens for free speech.” …

“A fundamental of democracy is not to discriminate. Colleges are supposed to be there for a free flow of ideas.”

Kiessling learned when she was 18 she was conceived by a rapist. Her birth certificate listed her father as an unknown male Caucasian.

She learned her birth mother also planned to abort the pregnancy, but couldn’t after a series of snow storms forced her to cancel her first two abortion clinic appointments. By then the pregnancy went too far into term, so her mother decided to give Rebecca up for adoption instead…

College spokesperson Cindy Buchanan said there were a number of reasons why the college cancelled the seminar.

She said organizers did not follow the proper process to bring a speaker into the school.

“To use the facilities you have to go through the proper channels,” she said, which includes informing the registrar of the event, the topic of discussion and ensuring the topic would be presented in a balanced manner.

“That was not the case here,” Buchanan said, adding the event was never formally approved by the college even though it had been scheduled for weeks through faculty members…

But it became an issue due to the political and religious issues arising from the abortion debate, said Buchanan. According to the college’s constitution, the school is not permitted to host events that provide a one-sided view of a political or religious issue…
 
40.png
Rosalinda:
According to the college’s constitution, the school is not permitted to host events that provide a one-sided view of a political or religious issue…
By these low standards Jesus would not be allowed to speak.
 
…you would think that being an institution of learning that they would be interested in the Pro-Life view, and if they wanted to give the Pro-Death side equal time they could… either way, the kids at the college level are old enough to listen and learn without any harm in my view… :cool:

…of course if it was due to the religiosity of the subject, then you might have to grant equal time to the other 36000 denominations… :eek:

…hmm… still surprised that it wasn’t allowed at that level however…

Peace:thumbsup:
 
40.png
fix:
By these low standards Jesus would not be allowed to speak.
And they definitely woudn’t want to hear this:

**Catholic Commencements: A Time for Truth to Be Honored **
By James V. Schall, S.J. | June 4, 2005

*What concerns the Church in the case of honorary degrees, I think, is the image of a person who maintains he is Catholic, who claims that he does not disagree with the Church’s positions personally, but gives reasons why laws or procedures contrary to these positions are objectively acceptable. What we should expect from Catholics is a response that seeks in every way to find alternatives to lessen or eliminate these positions through political or other action. There are in fact politicians whose record does this. Implicitly, the person who takes a position that ends up in supporting or promoting abortion announces his view that, by his own authority, the Church is wrong. Or else he insists that the Church is requiring an impossible position, which amounts to the same thing.

Honorary degrees should be given for what is honorable. They should testify to what is honorable. They should be in a context of knowing what is honorable and what is not. By giving an honorary degree a university, whether it knows it or not, teaches us what it stands for. By accepting a degree, the recipient tells us what he stands for. Honor is a subtle thing, much more subtle than monetary rewards, as Aristotle also saw. It intends to emphasize the good, true, and beautiful in a particular way, in the way that such institutions can point to the importance of these realities and their understanding of them.

The universities in the Catholic tradition are not designed to confuse us about what the truth as that truth is enlightened by reasoning and revelation. The world is full of folks who do not hold these positions. This is why the Church, as the new Pope has said, the Church is by its nature missionary. What cannot be honored are views that clearly undermine what the Church holds to be valid. Why a school would choose someone who takes a position contrary to the Church’s views, or why someone would want to be called Catholic or be honored who takes a contrary view, are rather curious issues. One possibility is that the school or the honoree thinks that the Church is wrong. The other possibility is that there is a deep-seated reluctance to cut one’s ties with the Church on the suspicion that such an act would be a final break with a tradition that claims to be true.

In either case, the question of “who is honored at commencements?” is no neutral consideration. It does reveal, in a rather obvious way, just what a school thinks it is about and just what the one honored stands for in the light of the attention focused on him by the honor. One might phrase the issue this way: “Tell me what you honor and I will tell you what you are.” What we see worked out at university graduations, more than we might at first suspect, is a particular answer to this question. If in this context, the Church has its own response to such particular questions, it is in fact doing little more than proclaiming what it is, a source of truth that it too must uphold because it is true.*

ignatiusinsight.com/features2005/schall_cathcommence_jun05.asp

Nope, definitely can’t have anyone talking about TRUTH and HONOR. At least not in the “Towers of Tolerance” of Today’s Colleges and Universities, which can tolerate ANYTHING EXCEPT FOR THE TRUTH!

Blessed are they who act to save God’s Little Ones. Michael
 
Traditional Ang, I love the line, “Tell me what you honor and I will tell you what you are.”

Thank you, it is already jotted down in my notebook. 😉
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top