Commentary: "Anti-pandemic rules are the opposite of climate change prevention"

[Maxirad]

Um, is global warming/climate change a scam?

Anti-pandemic rules are the opposite of climate change prevention - Washington Examiner

It’s unnerving, and perhaps instructive, that the arrangements that elites have been prescribing for dealing with what they call our most dangerous environmental threat (climate change, formerly known as global warming) are almost precisely the opposite of the arrangements deployed to deal with...

www.washingtonexaminer.com

 

[adamhovey1988]

This is something I do not pretend to be an expert in, but, I fail to see how telling people to stay at home is bad for the environment.

 

[Emeraldlady]

Lol. Surely that’s a satirical piece of writing. And the author being Michael Barone. Isn’t he one of Rays children?

 

[Dovekin]

Umm…Maybe the Washington Examiner is a scam?

Ask the airlines if their carbon footprint is growing or shrinking. Check at a gas station if they are selling as much gasoline.

Working from home was always a way to greenhouse gases, and it will probably increase now that people have been forced to try it.

Of course, “anti-pandemic rules” will have some impacts on climate change. Losing 10% of the population, like Italy, will certainly impact climate change more than if everyone follows the rules and we only lose .05% of the population, like Germany.