Communication technology and Prayer

  • Thread starter Thread starter RoyNeary2001
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
R

RoyNeary2001

Guest
Whether communications technology distracts from prayer?

Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologica Second Part of the Second Part Question 83 Article 1, under the category of the connected virtue of religion to justice- asked Whether prayer is an act of the appetitive power.
Aquinas’s premise is an article of faith from Psalm 38:13, that prayer is spoken reason. Aquinas then proceeds by saying, “Now the speculative and practical reason differ…[Speculative merely apprehends its object. The practical not only apprehends but causes] Now one thing is the cause of another in two ways: first perfectly, when it necessitates its effect, and this happens when the effect is wholly subject to the power of the cause; secondly, imperfectly, by merely disposing to the effect, for the reason that the effect is not wholly subject to the power of the cause. Accordingly, [reason has the capacity] to command not only the lower powers and the members of the body, but also human subjects, which indeed is done by commanding; secondly, by lead up to the effect, and, in a way, disposing to it, and in this sense the reason asks for something to be done by things not subject to it, whether they be its equals or its superiors. Now, both of these, namely, to command and to ask or beseech, imply a certain ordering, seeing that men proposes something to be effected by something else…”
Aquinas continued with his speculative apprehension of the particular instance of prayer by going through the origins of the word in Latin signifying speech or mouth, and beseeching or petition, asking of God – concluding that prayer is an act of practical reason.
Thus, the practical reason apprehends along with the power of causation. Prayer as an act of practical reason is not the cause necessitating its effect, because the effect is not subject to a power beyond its own cause. Prayer asks something to be done through an object of apprehension not subject to practical reason.
If, however, practical reason is engaged to effect what is subject to its power (ie economic activity, utilitarian activity, rhetorical persuasion, making and producing tangible goods and services), then spiritual strength and vision is diminished by secular habits of thought and practice.
Western culture is very oriented to functional tasks of production and communication of information. Prayer is weakened by the exercise of practical reason only for secular pursuits. Even when prayer is exercised it becomes an act of commanding rather than petitioning. Texting, email and cell phone use has become an inversion of prayer among equals asking something to be done.
 
Well, you have made a very odd use of the word apprehend, which I believe means to ‘lay hands upon’. Sorry but I do not see how that word helps your remarks.

Otherwise, in all my time online there has been only one situation in which I was asked to pray. It happen on the sci-fi forums.

A young man started a thread entitled “Is there a God?”. The thread became very long, having about 1,000 posts. One of the contributers who believed in God told us that his mother had been taken to a hospital and was in critical condion in intensive care. The doctors had said that it was not likely that she would live.

He asked us to pray for her, and a young woman and myself posted that we were praying for her. Also on the thread, were some atheists who had been involved for quite a while.

After a few days he reported that his mother had passed the crisis and had left the hospital.

There was not one word about any of it from the atheists…

Best regards,

Vincent
 
Well, you have made a very odd use of the word apprehend, which I believe means to ‘lay hands upon’. Sorry but I do not see how that word helps your remarks.
How has that word not helped the remarks? What word would you use?
 
How has that word not helped the remarks? What word would you use?
Well, it is a bit antiquated. When you say that something is apprehended, do you mean that it was perceived, cognized, recognized, understood, etc…
 
Well, it is a bit antiquated. When you say that something is apprehended, do you mean that it was perceived, cognized, recognized, understood, etc…
So I will have to look in dictionary for the origin of the word. I cannot imagine that it is any more antiquated than to say comprehend.
Yeah, the second definition in dictionary includes taking hold of mentally; perceive or understanding. The Latin is apprehendere- to understand.
 
So I will have to look in dictionary for the origin of the word. I cannot imagine that it is any more antiquated than to say comprehend.
Yeah, the second definition in dictionary includes taking hold of mentally; perceive or understanding. The Latin is apprehendere- to understand.
Well, does the first definition have anything to do with apprehension by police officers?
 
Well, does the first definition have anything to do with apprehension by police officers?
To take into custody; capture or arrest. Yeah, the transitive verb. The noun apphrension follows in same way. The third definition of the latter means judgement or opinion. By now, the fourth definition of the noun is anxious feeling of foreboding; dread.
 
To take into custody; capture or arrest. Yeah, the transitive verb. The noun apphrension follows in same way. The third definition of the latter means judgement or opinion. By now, the fourth definition of the noun is anxious feeling of foreboding; dread.
I had the nicest Websters unabridged dictionary. It was copyrighted in 1943, when the war was going on. It was wonderful it had the most sensible definitions of everything. most definitions were close to the root meaning.

While the war raged, people really needed to know how to think things out. I had used that dictionary to settle arguments with skeptics on the net, and it was very effective.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top