P
poche
Guest
If the pastor approved it with the idea that this would substitute for the mass obligation on Sunday then, while not most of us would be the best, it could.
There is no substitute for the Sunday obligation.If the pastor approved it with the idea that this would substitute for the mass obligation on Sunday then, while not most of us would be the best, it could.
When I was incarcerated, we had a one of two visiting preist about once a month and a deacon who did a liturgical mass and communion every Sunday that we did not have a Preist. Obviously he did not do confession or the concentrating part of the mass. However this was under the bishop of that diocese because of our special circumstances.So our retreat leader arranged for us to have a Sunday morning Communion Service instead.
Right. In fact, the circumstances you describe are within the spirit of the direction that the Church gives. On those days, there could not be a priest available at all, and therefore, the bishop allowed a Liturgy that was not the Mass.However this was under the bishop of that diocese because of our special circumstances.
I think it’s the other way around. The Church would of course rather have a priest available to offer Mass every Sunday, but allows a Liturgy of the Word with Communion on Sundays when this is not possible.By rights, there shouldn’t be a Liturgy of the Word with Communion on a Sunday.
The OP did not say the pastor had given a dispensation. The OP said he was not available for a morning Mass.a good reason to offer that dispensation?
Considering that the context of the question is that there is a “priest available to offer Mass [on] Sunday”, I don’t think I’ve gotten this one backward.I think it’s the other way around. The Church would of course rather have a priest available to offer Mass every Sunday, but allows a Liturgy of the Word with Communion on Sundays when this is not possible.