E
elts1956
Guest
The thirty day window during which Obama will accept the pros and cons of lifting all Conscience Clauses for those in the medical field who cannot in good conscience perform abortions has begun. We need to write and tell this administration why we oppose such a deletion of the clauses. Although I don’t consider my self to be either the brightest bulb in the chandalier, neither do I consider myself to be overly dimwitted. However, I am having trouble deciphering the four guidlines one must follow to submit any criticizim of deleting the Conscience protections. Look at these below and see if you can figure all four of them out. I am having a hard time doing so. Can the brightest bulb in the chandalier figure these out and give a brief response/examples to them so we not so dim witted people can post an opinion to the now Pres. and his minions? Thanks.
lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/mar/09030613.html
Comments may be submitted by email at proposedrescission@hhs.gov
According to the Proposed Rule comments should provide the following:
"1. Information, including specific examples where feasible, addressing the scope and nature of the problems giving rise to the need for federal rulemaking and how the current rule would resolve those problems.
"2. Information, including specific examples where feasible, supporting or refuting allegations that the December 19, 2008 final rule reduces access to information and health care services, particularly by low- income women.
"3. Comment on whether the December 19, 2008 final rule provides sufficient clarity to minimize the potential for harm resulting from any ambiguity and confusion that may exist because of the rule; and
“4. Comment on whether the objectives of the December 19, 2008 final rule might also be accomplished through non-regulatory means, such as outreach and education.”
lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/mar/09030613.html
Comments may be submitted by email at proposedrescission@hhs.gov
According to the Proposed Rule comments should provide the following:
"1. Information, including specific examples where feasible, addressing the scope and nature of the problems giving rise to the need for federal rulemaking and how the current rule would resolve those problems.
"2. Information, including specific examples where feasible, supporting or refuting allegations that the December 19, 2008 final rule reduces access to information and health care services, particularly by low- income women.
"3. Comment on whether the December 19, 2008 final rule provides sufficient clarity to minimize the potential for harm resulting from any ambiguity and confusion that may exist because of the rule; and
“4. Comment on whether the objectives of the December 19, 2008 final rule might also be accomplished through non-regulatory means, such as outreach and education.”
