J
Jeanne_S
Guest
None of which is the case currently. No singing,masks only 25%of capacity at any Mass.I think a lot of people have gotten comfortable with attending Mass in their pjs and coffee.
It may not be “less of a concern” but people literally have to go out to buy groceries.It’s would seem to me that if one isn’t attending Mass because they are fearful of exposure,then why is going out to eat,shopping etc.any less of a concern?
And whenever they want, as well. It’s going to be difficult to entice them to attend Mass in church again.I think a lot of people have gotten comfortable with attending Mass in their pjs and coffee.
Exactly. That, the pharmacy, and getting gas are my “shopping activities”. Sometimes I’m too lazy to cook, and I’ll get take-out. I’ll occasionally have a coffee with another high-risk friend.It may not be “less of a concern” but people literally have to go out to buy groceries.
That’s a lot easier to say when you have large churches . . . mine is in a converted three car garage, which got extended a few feet along the long side when the Holy Place got added at the end . . .One statement he said,if you are going out to partake of other activities,you need to get back to in person Mass.
So only several times more dangerous than a larger building where people are far more spread out . . .None of which is the case currently. No singing,masks only 25%of capacity at any Mass.
Nor here; in fact, it was just extended “indefinitely” (disrupting my early argument somewhere on this forum that an end point was needed for dispensations).The dispensation here has not been lifted,
Well remember that an institution that deals with eternity often has a different concept of time! My favourite: a new antiphonary was promised for the Liturgy of the Hours when it came out in 1970 “soon”. The second volume appeared… in 2010. The first (!!!) this year. That’s 40 and 50 years respectively. Go figure. (yes that order is correct, the volume for Vespers on Sundays, feasts and solemnities, Volume II, came out 10 years before the equivalent volume for Lauds, Volume I.)Nor here; in fact, it was just extended “indefinitely” (disrupting my early argument somewhere on this forum that an end point was needed for dispensations).
That’s downright quick . . . the suspension of receiving under both species and the “witnessing” loophole for marriage vows both took 700 years to get around to fixing . . .My favourite: a new antiphonary was promised for the Liturgy of the Hours when it came out in 1970 “soon”. The second volume appeared… in 2010.
We really don’t have a percentage, but every other pew is roped off and only families can sit together. Others must sit apart. Our Masses are full, people do get turned away if there is no seating, they are told when the next Mass is and advised to be there early to get a seat.PaulinVA:![]()
Well, to be fair, that assumes that churches are packed to capacity at every weekend and holyday Mass. That’s not at all the case in many (most?) churchesIf the civil authority is only allowing 25% or 50% capacity in churches, then half the diocese, or more, theoretically, can’t attend Mass with regularity.
We have added one Mass on Sundays.pnewton:![]()
Presuming you have a sufficient number of priests to celebrate those Masses.At some point, a reasonable accommodation might be to increase the number of Masses.
It does take time, it is also ruining the finishing on our pews.If there are not enough priest to offer Mass enough for everyone to go, then it is not the time to life the dispensation. Another issue might be time, as disinfecting after each Mass before others enter takes a little time.