M
Michael_Mayo
Guest
They were all pre-Christian and most likely had no contact with Judaism. Yet, they sought truth and virtue.
Any number of souls of the dead, remembered or not remembered, could be in heaven. We commemorate them all on All Saints.They were all pre-Christian and most likely had no contact with Judaism. Yet, they sought truth and virtue.
The Buddha was a saint for a time, until he was removed from the list in the purge of legendary saints.Could Buddha be a saint?
Well according to the RCC, anyone who reaches heaven is a saint anyway. Right?
The article is here: oce.catholic.com/index.php?title=Barlaam_and_JosaphatThe Buddha was a saint for a time, until he was removed from the list in the purge of legendary saints.
There is an article in the Catholic Encyclopedia: ‘Barlaam and Josaphat’ IIRC. I can’t check as newadvent.org/ seems to be down at the moment.
rossum
I don’t think the question was one of official declaration. The Church is not likely to formally declare any of those listed a saint, you are right. But could they now be in heaven, which is what a saint is, declared or not? I say yes, they could be. To deny it would be to deny the potential of God’s love and mercy, the saving power of Jesus.Other non Christian Religions don’t share the concept of “Saint” , to be declared a Saint officially you have to be Catholic, Latin or Eastern, and it all has to be investigated by the Church on the merit on the person who is going to be declared a Saint by the Church, like for instance Archbishop Fulton Sheen life is being thoroughly investigated plus 3 miracles are also needed…
Why would the Catholic Church be interested in declaring a non Catholic a Saint, let there denomination do that, what happened before the Reformation since all were Catholic .People were declared a Saint by popular vote of the people and all the miracles they performed an iffy way of going on so it was put after the Reformation in a more uniform way for those people declared a Saint by the Catholic Church had to be investigated properly for miracles, and that they had led a Holy Life (For instance Padre Pio).
As you understand itYou can say what you like, I go by the Catholic Church’s teaching.
I agree. Catholic, after all, means universal…inclusive of all people of all ages and places who seek the truth and to live a virtuous life.I don’t think the question was one of official declaration. The Church is not likely to formally declare any of those listed a saint, you are right. But could they now be in heaven, which is what a saint is, declared or not? I say yes, they could be. To deny it would be to deny the potential of God’s love and mercy, the saving power of Jesus.
Thank you. That is indeed the article I was trying to reference.The article is here: oce.catholic.com/index.php?title=Barlaam_and_Josaphat
"…All the prophets have from the beginning cried out to my soul, imploring her to make herself a virgin and prepare herself to receive the Divine Son into her immaculate womb;
Imploring her to become a ladder, down which God will descend into the world, and up which man will ascend to God;
Imploring her to drain the red sea of sanguinary passions within herself, so that man the slave can cross over to the promised land, the land of freedom.
The wise man of China admonishes my soul to be peaceful and still, and to wait for Tao to act within her. Glory be the memory of Lao-tse, the teacher and prophet of his people!
The wise man of India teaches my soul not to be afraid of suffering, but through the arduous and relentless drilling in purification and prayer to elevate herself to the One on high, who will come out to greet her and manifest to her His face and His power. Glorious be the memory of Krishna, the teacher and prophet of his people!
The royal son of India teaches my soul to empty herself completely of every seed and crop of the world, to abandon all the serpentine allurements of frail and shadowy matter, and then—in vacuity, tranquility, purity and bliss—to await nirvana. Blessed be the memory of Buddha, the royal son and inexorable teacher of his people!..
if somebody thinks still that a few thousands of Christian saints are not a sufficient argument to show that saintliness is practicable, then the Church has still not to give her ideal up and to take as her ideal thousands of great and small Napoleons and Bismarcks, and Goethes and Spencers, or Medics and Cromwells or Kaisers and Kings–no, in** the latter case it would be much nicer for the Church to point out the saintly men outside of Christian walls, like St Hermes and St Pythagoras, or St Krishna and St Buddha, or St Lao-Tse and St Confucius, or St Zoroaster and St Abu-Bekr. Better even is unbaptised saintliness than baptised earthliness**…"
***– St Nikolai Velimirovich (Chapter XLVIII; Prayers by the Lake) ***
“Better even is unbaptised saintliness than baptised earthliness…”The Eastern Orthodox saint Nikolai Velimiorivich clearly thought so:
There is no doubt that the Buddha and Lao Tse achieved a mystical spiritual state that we can not imagine. It is likely that St Thomas did also and afterwards he refereed to his own writings as straw compared to the wisdom he received. Those who have been in the presence of the Dalai Lama talk about the aura of holiness he exudes. When discussing the authenticity of theistic spiritual experiences His Holiness the Dalai Lama says:They were all pre-Christian and most likely had no contact with Judaism. Yet, they sought truth and virtue.