D
dianaiad
Guest
So your stance is that Mormonism is not ‘pro-woman,’ and have a ‘woman as property’ stance because women do not hold the priesthood?That more has to do with them being available as plural wives for men in the celestial kingdom. They are subject to the man and him being her “priesthood holder.” Not a very pro-woman stance, seems more “women as property” to me.
Really?